AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to compare the bone-implant contact percentages of immediate-loaded implants versus nonloaded (control) implants in nonhuman primates.
  • Ninety days post-surgery, results showed that immediate-loaded implants had a higher average contact percentage (62.4%) compared to control implants (56.3%), though one immediate-loaded implant failed and two had lower contact percentages.
  • The findings suggest that while immediate loading of implants can enhance bone integration, there are risks involved, highlighting a need for careful consideration in clinical applications.

Article Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate a square-thread design implant and compare the bone-implant contact percentage between immediate-loaded and nonloaded implants (controls) in nonhuman primates.

Materials: Five nonhuman primates each received 3 implants, with a total of 5 control implants and 10 immediate-loaded implants in posterior regions of the mouth. Ninety days after surgery (and function was appropriate), block sections of the implants were removed and sectioned in 200-mum thick pieces. The block sections were stained with modified Masson for evaluation of the bone-implant contact percentage.

Results: One of the immediate-loaded implants failed. The bone-implant contact percentage of control implants ranged from 50.34% to 64.13% and averaged 56.3%. The bone-implant contact percentage of immediate-loaded implants ranged from 43.23% to 75.72%, with an average of 62.4%. Two implants had lower bone-implant contact percentage than the others, and when these are not included in the evaluation, the bone-implant contact percentage average increased to 67.6%.

Conclusions: Immediate-loaded implants in the nonhuman primates often have a higher bone-implant contact percentage at 90 days than unloaded implants. The bone remodeling is different for loaded implant-bone interfaces than for unloaded conditions. However, 1 immediate-loaded implant failed, and 2 implants had lower bone-implant contact percentage than controls. Therefore, although there are benefits of immediate loading, there appear to also be some risks.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ID.0b013e3180500a84DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bone-implant contact
32
contact percentage
28
immediate-loaded implants
16
implants
13
nonhuman primates
12
implants nonhuman
8
bone-implant
8
contact
8
percentage immediate-loaded
8
control implants
8

Similar Publications

Background And Objective: Dental implant therapy faces challenges in patients with Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM and T2DM) due to adverse effects on bone metabolism and immune response. Despite advancements, diabetic patients face higher risks of peri-implantitis and compromised osseointegration. This review assesses the impact of anti-diabetic medications on implant outcomes, offering insights to bridge the gap between animal studies and clinical practice.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aim: We aimed to investigate whether α-ketoglutarate (AKG) can promote autophagic activity under a peri-implant condition to enhance the osseointegration of dental implant in rats with osteoporosis (OP).

Methods: Con, Model and AKG groups were established for the random allocation of thirty rats ( = 10). Their bone metabolism indicators were measured.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Osteomyelitis with a high recurrence rate. Timely-prevention can avoid severe consequence and death. However, conventional drug response-release has the disadvantages of unnecessary release and waste, causing ineffective prevention.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: A crucial aspect of contemporary dental implant research is modifying implant microdesign to achieve early and robust osseointegration. This study describes a new facile subtraction approach for microdesign modification of titanium implants using akali-hydrothermal followed by ion-exchange reaction (AHIE) in a salt solution, and compares osseointegration performance to machined titanium alloy (negative control) implants.

Methods: The morphology, wettability, and roughness of the implant surfaces were evaluated.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Nano-engineering in dentistry has improved dental implants through advanced surface modifications, enhancing bone cell interaction and osseointegration.
  • The study involved modifying zirconia implants with allylamine and fibronectin nanoproteins, tested on rabbits over 12 weeks for stability and bone integration.
  • Results showed significant stability and new bone formation in treated implants, indicating that nanoparticle modifications effectively boost dental implant performance.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!