Background: The impact of primary Gleason pattern was determined on cause-specific (CSS), biochemical progression-free (bPFS), and overall survival (OS) after brachytherapy for Gleason score 7 prostate cancer.
Methods: From April 1995 to October 2003, 530 patients underwent brachytherapy for Gleason score 3+4 (n = 300) or Gleason 4+3 (n = 230) prostate cancer. All patients underwent brachytherapy more than 3 years before analysis. The median follow-up was 5.7 years. Of the 530 patients, 412 (77.7%) received supplemental external beam radiation therapy (XRT) and 177 (33.4%) received androgen deprivation therapy. bPFS was defined by a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) =0.40 ng/mL after nadir. Multiple parameters were evaluated as predictors of CSS, bPFS, and OS.
Results: At 10 years, Gleason 3+4 versus 4+3 did not predict for CSS (96.7% vs 93.3%, P = .506), bPFS (97.0% vs 92.9%, P = .085), or OS (77.0% vs 78.0%, P = .933). Cox linear regression analysis demonstrated that clinical stage and radiation dose (D90) predicted for CSS, whereas pretreatment PSA, clinical stage, and prostate size predicted for bPFS. Patient age, diabetes, and tobacco were the strongest predictors for OS. To date, 57 patients have died, with 80.7% due to cardiovascular/pulmonary events or secondary malignancies. Five patients have died of prostate cancer.
Conclusions: The primary Gleason pattern did not impact CSS, bPFS, or OS in Gleason score 7 prostate cancer. Deaths from cardiovascular/pulmonary disease and second malignancies were 9.6 times more common than death from prostate cancer.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.22793 | DOI Listing |
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother
December 2024
Brachytherapy Department, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznan, Poland.
Brachytherapy
December 2024
Department of Radiology, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayamashi, Wakayama, Japan.
Purpose: High-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) combined with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) is an effective treatment for patients with high- and very-high-risk prostate cancer. We sought to identify the factors associated with reduced biochemical recurrence rates following HDR-BT.
Methods: A total of 304 patients with high- or very-high-risk prostate cancer who underwent HDR-BT and EBRT were analyzed.
Brachytherapy
December 2024
Department of Radiation Oncology, Corewell Health East William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, MI 48073.
Purpose: To present long-term toxicity and effectiveness outcomes of three prostate high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy schedules: 38 Gy in 4 fractions, 24 Gy in 2 fractions, and 27 Gy in 2 fractions for men with low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer.
Methods And Materials: Patients treated with HDR brachytherapy monotherapy for prostate cancer were identified in a prospectively maintained, single institution database. Patients with AJCC T-stage ≤ T2b, Gleason score ≤ 7, prostate-specific antigen level ≤ 20 ng/mL, and ≥2 years of follow-up were included.
Brachytherapy
November 2024
Department of Oncology, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden; Department of oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Introduction: Treating localized high-risk prostate cancer with a combination of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) is a common approach. Moderately hypofractionated EBRT and a single HDR-BT boost simplifies the treatment. We aim to present our five-year results.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
November 2024
Department of Exploratory Liquid Biopsy in Malignant Tumors, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan. Electronic address:
Purpose: To analyze the effects of adjuvant hormonal therapy (AHT) on time to event after neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and I-transperineal prostate brachytherapy (TPPB), compared with neoadjuvant ADT and TPPB only, in patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer (IRPC).
Methods And Materials: In this multicenter, open-label, phase 3 randomized controlled trial (SHIP0804), 421 patients with IRPC were randomly assigned to either 9-month AHT (AHT arm) or no AHT (non-AHT arm) after 3 months of neoadjuvant ADT and TPPB. The primary endpoint was biochemical progression-free survival, and secondary endpoints included overall survival and clinical progression-free survival.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!