Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Study Design: Survey.
Objective: To understand the variation in scoliosis surgery and perioperative care among spinal deformity surgeons.
Summary Of Background Data: While variation in care has been well described in many spinal disorders, the degree of variation has not been described for spinal deformity.
Methods: Clinical histories and radiographs of 4 typical spinal deformity patients were sent to spinal deformity surgeons for review. The cases consisted of idiopathic thoracolumbar, double major, and right thoracic curves and a neuromuscular lumbar curve. The survey queried choice of surgical approach, levels fused and instrumented, type of instrumentation, preoperative testing, intraoperative neurologic monitoring, blood and antibiotic use, and postoperative care, including pain control and patient mobilization. Cost estimates for each case were obtained from the individual hospitals' pricing.
Results: There was wide variation in the specific fusion levels and instrumentation for the idiopathic curves. The variation was greatest for the thoracolumbar curve. The double major and right thoracic curves differed primarily in their choice of instrumenting secondary curves. The neuromuscular curve had the least variation. Costs estimates were widely disparate between centers. Perioperative care had much less disparity.
Conclusions: Agreement appears common in areas with readily identifiable outcomes such as shorter length of stay and rapid postoperative mobilization. However, agreement is poor in areas where outcomes are difficult to measure and require long-term follow-up such as instrumentation fusion and levels.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e318060a65a | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!