Introduction: Atrial macroreentry tachycardia (AMRT) in patients without obvious structural heart disease or previous surgical or catheter intervention has not been characterized in detail.
Methods And Results: Electroanatomical mapping and ablation of right or left AMRT were performed in 33 patients. Right atrial central conduction obstacle was formed by an electrically silent area (ESA) in 15 (68%) patients and by a line of double potentials (DPs) in seven (32%) patients. Left atrial ESAs were found in all 11 patients with the left AMRT. Reentry circuit was reconstructed in 19 (86%) patients with right AMRT and seven (64%) patients with left AMRT. Of the ESA-related right AMRT, eight (50%) were double-loop reentry circuits utilizing a narrow critical isthmus within the ESA and eight (50%) were single-loop reentry circuits with a critical isthmus bounded by ESA and either ostium of the vena cava. Single-loop DP-related AMRTs had the critical isthmus between the DP line and the ostium of the inferior vena cava (IVC). Left AMRTs included a variety of single-, double-, or triple-loop reentry circuits and their critical isthmuses. During the 37 +/- 15 month follow-up, atrial tachyarrhythmia-free clinical outcome was achieved in 21 (95%) patients (18 patients, 82%, without antiarrhythmic drugs) with the right AMRT and in nine (82%) patients (six patients, 55%, without antiarrhythmic drugs) with the left AMRT.
Conclusion: The majority of right and left AMRTs were related to the presence of ESA. Ablation can be successful with a favorable risk of atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8167.2007.00859.x | DOI Listing |
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol
December 2024
Division of Cardiology, University of California San Francisco (H.H.H., A.C.L., M.M.S.).
Complex ventricular tachycardias involving the fascicular system (fascicular ventricular tachycardias [FVTs]) can be challenging. In this review, we describe our approach to the diagnosis and ablation of these arrhythmias with 10 illustrative cases that involve (1) differentiation from supraventricular tachycardia; (2) assessment for atypical bundle branch reentry and other interfascicular FVTs; (3) examination of P1/P2 activation sequences in sinus rhythm, pacing, and tachycardia; and (4) entrainment techniques to establish the tachycardia mechanism and aid circuit localization. To summarize, 5 cases had prior ablation with 2 previously misdiagnosed as supraventricular tachycardia.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNanophotonics
May 2024
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
Heart Rhythm
November 2024
Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York.
J Vet Intern Med
December 2024
Equine Cardioteam Ghent, Department of Internal Medicine, Reproduction and Population Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.
JACC Clin Electrophysiol
December 2024
Cardiac Electrophysiology Section, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Catheter ablation to prevent ventricular tachycardia (VT) that emerges late after a myocardial infarction aims to interrupt the re-entry substrate. Interruption of potential channels and regions of slow conduction that can be identified during stable sinus or paced rhythm is often effective and a number of substrate markers for guiding this approach have been described. While there is substantial agreement with different markers in some patients, the different markers select different regions for ablation in others.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!