Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the new bone formation and biodegradability of various bone fillers placed underneath a nonresorbable membrane (expanded polytetrafluoroethylene [e-PTFE]) in standardized defects in a beagle dog model. Mandibular premolars and first molars were extracted bilaterally in six adult female beagle dogs. Three months after the extractions, six rectangular defects (4 mm apicocoronally, 7 mm mesiodistally, and the entire width of the ridge buccolingually) were surgically created in the alveolar processes. All defects were covered with an e-PTFE membrane and stabilized buccally with stainless steel fixation screws. Five different bone fillers were placed under the membranes in a random configuration in each dog: autogenous bone, demineralized freeze-dried bone, anorganic bovine bone, tricalcium phosphate granules, and collagen sponge. One site in each animal was treated with the e-PTFE membrane alone. Following an 8-month healing period, a bone core was harvested from each grafted site using a trephine drill. Samples from each of the grafted sites were evaluated histologically and histometrically for their bone regenerative potential. The result of this study demonstrated a positive effect of bone fillers on bone regeneration when combined with a nonresorbable membrane; however, no significant differences were found between the various bone fillers in terms of their regenerative potential.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!