Various measures of binaural timing sensitivity were made in three bilateral cochlear implant users, who had demonstrated moderate-to-good interaural time delay (ITD) sensitivity at 100 pulses-per-second (pps). Overall, ITD thresholds increased at higher pulse rates, lower levels, and shorter durations, although intersubject differences were evident. Monaural rate-discrimination thresholds, using the same stimulation parameters, showed more substantial elevation than ITDs with increased rate. ITD sensitivity with 6000 pps stimuli, amplitude-modulated at 100 Hz, was similar to that with unmodulated pulse trains at 100 pps, but at 200 and 300 Hz performance was poorer than with unmodulated signals. Measures of sensitivity to binaural beats with unmodulated pulse-trains showed that all three subjects could use time-varying ITD cues at 100 pps, but not 300 pps, even though static ITD sensitivity was relatively unaffected over that range. The difference between static and dynamic ITD thresholds is discussed in terms of relative contributions from initial and later arriving cues, which was further examined in an experiment using two-pulse stimuli as a function of interpulse separation. In agreement with the binaural-beat data, findings from that experiment showed poor discrimination of ITDs on the second pulse when the interval between pulses was reduced to a few milliseconds.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.2537300 | DOI Listing |
PLoS One
January 2025
Deptartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America.
Binaural speech intelligibility in rooms is a complex process that is affected by many factors including room acoustics, hearing loss, and hearing aid (HA) signal processing. Intelligibility is evaluated in this paper for a simulated room combined with a simulated hearing aid. The test conditions comprise three spatial configurations of the speech and noise sources, simulated anechoic and concert hall acoustics, three amounts of multitalker babble interference, the hearing status of the listeners, and three degrees of simulated HA processing provided to compensate for the noise and/or hearing loss.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBioengineering (Basel)
December 2024
Faculty of Electronics, Communication and Computers, Pitești University Center, National University of Science and Technology POLITEHNICA Bucharest, 110040 Pitesti, Romania.
Anxiety is a widespread mental health issue, and binaural beats have been explored as a potential non-invasive treatment. EEG data reveal changes in neural oscillation and connectivity linked to anxiety reduction; however, harmonics introduced during signal acquisition and processing often distort these findings. Existing methods struggle to effectively reduce harmonics and capture the fine-grained temporal dynamics of EEG signals, leading to inaccurate feature extraction.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSci Rep
December 2024
Neurobiological Research Laboratory, Section for Experimental and Clinical Otology, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Killianst. 5, 79106, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.
Bilateral cochlear implant (CI) patients exhibit significant limitations in spatial hearing. Their ability to process interaural time differences (ITDs) is often impaired, while their ability to process interaural level differences (ILDs) remains comparatively good. Clinical studies aiming to identify the causes of these limitations are often plagued by confounds and ethical limitations.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFTrends Hear
December 2024
School of Psychology, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.
Interaural time differences are often considered a weak cue for stream segregation. We investigated this claim with headphone-presented pure tones differing in a related form of interaural configuration-interaural phase differences (ΔIPD)-or/and in frequency (ΔF). In experiment 1, sequences comprised 5 × ABA- repetitions (A and B = 80-ms tones, "-" = 160-ms silence), and listeners reported whether integration or segregation was heard.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEur J Neurosci
January 2025
Experimental Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Binaural unmasking is a remarkable phenomenon that it is substantially easier to detect a signal in noise when the interaural parameters of the signal are different from those of the noise - a useful mechanism in so-called cocktail party scenarios. In this study, we investigated the effect of binaural unmasking on neural tracking of the speech envelope. We measured EEG in 8 participants who listened to speech in noise at a fixed signal-to-noise ratio, in two conditions: one where speech and noise had the same interaural phase difference (both speech and noise having an opposite waveform across ears, SπNπ), and one where the interaural phase difference of the speech was different from that of the noise (only the speech having an opposite waveform across ears, SπN).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!