Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Motivation: Analysis of high-throughput proteomic/genomic data, in particular, surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (SELDI-TOF MS) data and microarray data, has led to a multitude of techniques aimed at identifying potential biomarkers. Most of the statistical techniques for comparing two groups are based on qualitative measures such as P-value. A quantitative way such as interval estimation for the contrasts of two groups is more appealing.
Results: We have devised a simultaneous confidence bands method capable of detecting potential biomarkers, while controlling for overall confidence coverage level, in high-dimensional datasets that discriminate two treatment groups using a permutation scheme. For example, for the SELDI-TOF MS data, we deal with the entire spectrum simultaneously and construct (1 - alpha) confidence bands for the mean differences between groups. Furthermore, peaks were identified based on the maximal differences between the groups as determined by the confidence bands. The analysis method herein described gives both qualitative (P-value) and quantitative data (magnitude of difference). The Clinical Proteomics Programs Databank's ovarian cancer dataset and data from in-house samples containing known spiked-in proteins were analyzed. We were able to identify potential biomarkers similar to those described in previous analysis of the ovarian cancer data, however, while these markers are highly significant between cancer and normal groups, our analysis indicated the absolute difference between the two groups was minimal. In addition, we found additional markers than those previously described with greater differences in average intensities. The proposed confidence bands method successfully detected the spiked-in peaks, as well as, secondary peaks generated by adducts and double-charged species. We also illustrate our method utilizing paired gene expression data from a prostate cancer microarray experiment by constructing confidence bands for the fold changes between cancer and normal samples.
Availability: R-package, 'seie.zip' (license: GNU GPL), is publiclly available at http://research2.dfci.harvard.edu/dfci/MS_spike-in_data/
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btm130 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!