Explaining brightness illusions using spatial filtering and local response normalization.

Vision Res

Department of Cognitive Science, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093-0515, USA.

Published: June 2007

We introduce two new low-level computational models of brightness perception that account for a wide range of brightness illusions, including many variations on White's Effect [Perception, 8, 1979, 413]. Our models extend Blakeslee and McCourt's ODOG model [Vision Research, 39, 1999, 4361], which combines multiscale oriented difference-of-Gaussian filters and response normalization. We extend the response normalization to be more neurally plausible by constraining normalization to nearby receptive fields (models 1 and 2) and spatial frequencies (model 2), and show that both of these changes increase the effectiveness of the models at predicting brightness illusions.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2007.02.017DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

brightness illusions
12
response normalization
12
explaining brightness
4
illusions spatial
4
spatial filtering
4
filtering local
4
local response
4
normalization
4
normalization introduce
4
introduce low-level
4

Similar Publications

In humans, the eye pupils respond to both physical light sensed by the retina and mental representations of light produced by the brain. Notably, our pupils constrict when a visual stimulus is illusorily perceived brighter, even if retinal illumination is constant. However, it remains unclear whether such perceptual penetrability of pupil responses is an epiphenomenon unique to humans or whether it represents an adaptive mechanism shared with other animals to anticipate variations in retinal illumination between successive eye fixations.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Brightness illusions are a powerful tool in studying vision, yet their neural correlates are poorly understood. Based on a human paradigm, we presented illusory drifting gratings to mice. Primary visual cortex (V1) neurons responded to illusory gratings, matching their direction selectivity for real gratings, and they tracked the spatial phase offset between illusory and real gratings.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Glossiness perception and its pupillary response.

Vision Res

June 2024

Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Toyohashi University of Technology, Toyohashi, Aichi, Japan.

Recent studies have revealed that pupillary response changes depend on perceptual factors such as subjective brightness caused by optical illusions and luminance. However, the manner in which the perceptual factor that is derived from the glossiness perception of object surfaces affects the pupillary response remains unclear. We investigated the relationship between the glossiness perception and pupillary response through a glossiness rating experiment that included recording the pupil diameter.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Visual motion signals can produce self-motion perception known as vection in observers. Vection can be generated by illusory motions in the form of global expantion in still images as well as by visual motion signals. The perception of vection can be enhanced by flickering images at a rate of 5 Hz.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Bacteriorhodopsin, isolated from a halophilic bacterium, is a photosynthetic protein with a structure and function similar to those of the visual pigment rhodopsin. A voltaic cell with bacteriorhodopsin sandwiched between two transparent electrodes exhibits a time-differential response akin to that observed in retinal ganglion cells. It is intriguing as a means to emulate excitation and inhibition in the neural response.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!