Objective: To demonstrate that drotrecogin alfa (activated) has an acceptable safety profile 1 yr from randomization.

Design: One-year follow-up of patients participating in a placebo-controlled clinical study of drotrecogin alfa (activated) in severe sepsis patients at low risk of death (the ADDRESS study).

Setting: The study was conducted at 516 hospitals in 34 countries.

Patients: The study included 2,640 patients.

Interventions: One-year follow-up was performed as an addendum to the placebo-controlled ADDRESS study. Treatment groups were compared using the chi-square test and Kaplan-Meier estimates.

Measurements And Main Results: Survival status at 1 yr was obtained for 90% of patients enrolled in the study (n = 2,376). The difference in mortality rate between drotrecogin alfa (activated) and placebo patients was numerically smaller at 1 yr (34.2% and 34.0%, respectively, p = .94) than at 28 days (18.5% and 17.0%, respectively, p = .34). In the subgroups defined by organ dysfunction class (single or multiple) and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score (<25 or >or=25), the differences in mortality rate between treatment groups at 1 yr were consistent with those observed at 28 days; no significant differences in mortality rates between treatment groups were observed. No additional serious adverse events were reported during the period between hospital discharge and 1 yr.

Conclusions: No increased risk of death or evidence of harm at 1 yr was associated with drotrecogin alfa (activated) administration in patients with severe sepsis at lower risk of death.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.CCM.0000266588.95733.63DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

drotrecogin alfa
20
alfa activated
16
severe sepsis
12
risk death
12
treatment groups
12
one-year follow-up
8
mortality rate
8
differences mortality
8
drotrecogin
5
alfa
5

Similar Publications

Hydrocortisone plus fludrocortisone for community acquired pneumonia-related septic shock: a subgroup analysis of the APROCCHSS phase 3 randomised trial.

Lancet Respir Med

May 2024

Department of Intensive Care, Raymond Poincaré Hospital, APHP University Versailles Saint Quentin-University Paris Saclay, Garches, France; Institut Hospitalo Universitaire PROMETHEUS, Garches, France; Laboratory of Infection & Inflammation-U1173, School of Medicine, INSERM, University Versailles Saint Quentin-University Paris Saclay, Garches, France; FHU SEPSIS, Garches, France. Electronic address:

Article Synopsis
  • The study explores the effectiveness of hydrocortisone and fludrocortisone treatments in patients with septic shock caused by community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) compared to non-CAP cases.
  • It includes data from the phase 3 APROCCHSS trial, which initially tested these treatments across multiple centers in France, focusing specifically on how they impact mortality outcomes.
  • Results indicate that patients with CAP may respond differently to these treatments, and various mortality rates and recovery metrics were analyzed to determine the overall benefit of the steroid regimen.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Septic cardiomyopathy increases mortality by 70% to 90% and results in mechanical dysfunction of cells.

Methods: Here, we created a LPS-induced in-vitro sepsis model with mouse embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (mESC-CM) using the CellDrum technology which simultaneously measures mechanical compliance and beat frequency of mESCs. Visualization of reactive oxygen species (ROS), actin stress fibers, and mRNA quantification of endothelial protein C receptor (EPCR) and protease-activated receptor 1 (PAR1) before/after LPS incubation were used for method validation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Old drug, new Trick? The rationale for the treatment of COVID-19 with activated protein C.

Med Hypotheses

April 2021

Tufts University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Newton-Wellesley Hospital, 2014 Washington Street, Newton, MA 02462, USA. Electronic address:

As the COVID-19 pandemic continues, researchers seek to identify efficacious treatments. Current approaches to COVID-19 therapeutics focus on antiviral agents, convalescent plasma, monoclonal antibodies, immunomodulators and more traditional therapies such as steroids [1-6]. Reversing disturbances in coagulation has also been identified as a priority area for candidate therapies, such as through the Accelerating COVID-19 Therapeutic Interventions and Vaccines 4 adaptive clinical trial (ACTIV-4) which is currently evaluating aspirin, heparins and apixaban [7].

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Sepsis is a global health priority. Interventions to reduce the burden of sepsis need to be both effective and cost-effective. We performed a systematic review of the literature on health economic evaluations of sepsis treatments in critically ill adult patients and summarised the evidence for cost-effectiveness.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Sepsis can be defined as a life-threatening organ dysfunction due to a dysregulated host response to infection. In sepsis, the coagulation cascade is activated and the balance shifts to the procoagulant side. Recently, the use of protein C is proposed for the treatment of sepsis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!