Background: Nonsynostotic occipital plagiocephaly remains a diagnosis of concern in infancy. This study evaluates factors affecting the onset, treatment, and outcomes of nonsynostotic occipital plagiocephaly.
Methods: A retrospective chart review and telephone survey were performed. A posterior occipital deformation severity score was used. Factors such as demographics, behavioral and helmet therapy, feeding patterns, torticollis, multiple gestation pregnancies, prematurity, and congenital nonsynostotic occipital plagiocephaly were evaluated.
Results: One hundred five infants were identified. Of these, 95 percent were Caucasian, 93 percent were from two-parent households, and 70 percent were from households earning more than $50,000. Repositioning was attempted in 95 percent, and 45 percent progressed to helmet therapy. When comparing change in posterior occipital deformation severity score with helmet therapy to repositioning, a difference was found (p < 0.05). Forty-nine percent of patients were breast-fed, and when compared with the general population, a difference was found (p < 0.05). Twenty percent of infants had torticollis, and when compared with population norms, a difference was found (p < 0.05). Twelve percent of patients were twins, and when compared with population norms, more twinning occurred (p < 0.05). Congenital nonsynostotic occipital plagiocephaly was found in 10 percent of patients and did not result in an increased risk of progression to helmet therapy.
Conclusions: This study demonstrates trends that may predict additional risks for developing nonsynostotic occipital plagiocephaly, including torticollis, plural births, and increased socioeconomic affluence. In addition, the nonsynostotic occipital plagiocephaly cohort was breast-fed less than the general population, demonstrating that breast-feeding may be preventative, as breast-fed infants are repositioned more frequently and sleep for shorter periods. As in other studies, cranial molding helmet therapy was more effective in correcting nonsynostotic occipital plagiocephaly than repositioning alone.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000259190.56177.ca | DOI Listing |
Neurosurg Focus
January 2025
6Plastic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Objective: Sagittal synostosis is the most common type of craniosynostosis, resulting in deformity with distinctive morphological characteristics. These include occipital narrowing, parietal narrowing, anteriorly shifted vertex with parietal depression, and exaggerated frontal bossing. The traditional cephalic index affords limited reliability in quantifying initial severity and correction.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFOrthod Craniofac Res
May 2023
Department of Cleft Palate and Craniofacial Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Background: In unilateral lambdoid craniosynostosis (ULC), the posteriorly situated lambdoid suture of the cranial vault fuses prematurely. Positional posterior plagiocephaly (PPP) causes flattening of the posterior side of the head, either through external forces or through underlying differences in brain development. Both conditions cause occipital flattening of the head, but the aetiology is different.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Craniofac Surg
November 2022
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki.
Unilateral lambdoid synostosis is the rarest form of craniosynostosis. Surgical correction is technically challenging from a morphological standpoint and is used to decompress intracranial pressure. Herein, the authors present a "rotational advancement bone flap" technique for the repair of posterior plagiocephaly.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCleft Palate Craniofac J
October 2023
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Objective: Objective differentiation between unilateral coronal synostosis (UCS) and positional posterior plagiocephaly (PPP) based on 3D photogrammetry according to Utrecht Cranial Shape Quantificator (UCSQ).
Design: Retrospective study.
Setting: Primary craniofacial center.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!