Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
In an experimental work it was found that under conditions of muscle ischemia the revascularizing osteomyoplasty was better than revascularizing osteotrepanation: it resulted in 1.4 times greater diameter of muscle fibers and 1.3 times larger size of the capillary network. An analysis of treatment of 30 patients was made who had critical ischemia of the extremities against the background of a diffuse lesion of the arteries below the inguinal ligament. In the first group consisting of 15 patients standard revascularizing osteotrepanation of the femur and shin was performed, in the second group (15 patients) revascularizing osteomyoplasty on the shin was added to the revascularizing osteotrepanation on the femur. In the second group the percentage of "mild improvement" of the clinical status of the patients was 10 times greater, and the number of patients with "minimal improvement" was 3.7 times less.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!