Objective: Percutaneous spinal instrumentation techniques may be helpful to reduce approach-related morbidity inherent to conventional open surgery. This article reports technique, clinical outcomes, and fusion rates of percutaneous transforaminal lumbar interbody fixation (pTLIF). Results are compared with those of mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fixation (oTLIF) using a muscle splitting (Wiltse) approach.

Methods: pTLIF was performed in 43 patients with single-level and 10 patients with bi- or multilevel lumbar discopathy or degenerative pseudolisthesis resulting in axial back pain and claudication, pseudoradicular, or radicular symptoms. Decompression, discectomy, and interbody cage insertion were performed through 18-mm tubular retractors followed by percutaneous pedicle screw-rod fixation. Clinical outcome was assessed by early postoperative pain scores (visual analog score) and standardized functional outcome questionnaires (American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons lumbar spine and Roland-Morris low back pain score). Fusion rates were assessed by thin-slice computed tomographic scan at 16 months. Clinical outcome, time in the operating room, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative access-site pain were compared with an institutional reference series of 67 oTLIF procedures.

Results: Excellent and good clinical results were obtained in 46 (87%) out of 53 patients at 16 months. The time spent in the operating room was equivalent and the blood loss reduced compared with oTLIF (P < 0.01). There was no morbidity related to instrumentation. Postoperative pain was significantly lower after pTLIF after the second postoperative day (P < 0.01). The overall clinical outcome was not different from oTLIF at 8 and 16 months.

Conclusion: pTLIF allows for safe and efficient minimally invasive treatment of single and multilevel degenerative lumbar instability with good clinical results. Further prospective studies investigating long-term functional results are required to assess the definitive merits of percutaneous instrumentation of the lumbar spine.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000255388.03088.B7DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

transforaminal lumbar
12
lumbar interbody
12
clinical outcome
12
percutaneous transforaminal
8
lumbar
8
degenerative lumbar
8
lumbar instability
8
fusion rates
8
interbody fixation
8
postoperative pain
8

Similar Publications

Purpose: Synthetic cages are commonly used in posterior and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion procedures. Using morselized corticocancellous bone from spinous processes and laminae has been suggested as an alternative, especially in low-resource settings where access to synthetic cages is limited. The aim of this study was to compare radiographic and functional outcomes of synthetic cages with those of morselized local autograft.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: This study aims to perform a meta-analysis that integrates multiple literature sources to evaluate the clinical efficacy of oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) for treating lumbar degenerative diseases (LDD).

Methods: A systematic search was conducted across various databases, including CNKI, VIP, WANFANG DATA, SinoMed, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science, for clinical comparative studies on OLIF and MIS-TLIF for treating LDD, covering the time frame from the inception of the databases to September 2024. Following PRISMA guidelines, studies were screened, assessed, and data were extracted rigorously.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) are the most commonly conducted operations for interbody fusions. In addition to fusion, the restoration of proper spinal alignment has become crucial for achieving favorable functional outcomes. There is a lack of agreement on which lumbar interbody fusion technique provides the most effective correction for sagittal spinopelvic parameters (SSPs).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Dimensions of bony Kambin's triangle pertaining to endoscopic procedure.

Med J Armed Forces India

December 2024

Senior Consultant (Neurology), NH MMI Superspeciality, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India.

Background: Endoscopic procedures nowadays are successful, minimally invasive, and safer, with fewer intraoperative and postoperative complications and shorter hospital stays. Kambin's triangle (KT) is the three-dimensional configuration that is used as a transforaminal anatomical corridor for epidural steroid injections and endoscopic surgeries for various lumbar pathologies. This study aims to estimate the dimensions of KT and diameter of the cannula for the transforaminal surgical approaches using KT in the Chhattisgarh population.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Discectomy (PETD) is recognized as the leading surgical intervention for lumbar disc herniation (LDH). Moreover, Body Mass Index (BMI) has been established as an independent risk factor for disc reherniation post-PETD. Furthermore, there is a lack of studies investigating the biomechanical changes in the disc post-PETD in relation to diverse BMI levels.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!