Reader variability: what we can learn from computer-aided detection experiments.

J Am Coll Radiol

Lombardi Cancer Center, Division of Cancer Genetics and Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20057, USA.

Published: June 2006

Radiologists interpreting images vary in their identification of disease. When 1 radiologist reinterprets the same case differently, it is called intraobserver variability; when 2 radiologists differ with each other on a case, it is called interobserver variability. Computer-aided detection (CAD) systems can increase the detection of disease. When radiologists use these systems, they are aided in the detection of lesions that they might have detected had they reinterpreted the images or that other radiologists might have identified had they interpreted the images without CAD. This article demonstrates how most cases "newly" identified by radiologists working with CAD are actually cases that the radiologists or other radiologists would have identified had they interpreted the images without CAD. Computer-aided detection, therefore, decreases intraobserver variability and interobserver variability.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2006.02.025DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

computer-aided detection
12
intraobserver variability
8
interobserver variability
8
radiologists identified
8
identified interpreted
8
interpreted images
8
images cad
8
radiologists
7
detection
5
reader variability
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!