Background: Infection with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and lung cancer represent two problems beginning in the 20th century that are of epidemic proportions. By the end of the 20th century, therapeutic programs of modest efficacy had been developed for both. Because both HIV infection and lung cancer are common, it is not surprising that a number of patients would be afflicted with both diseases simultaneously. There is a very limited literature regarding the treatment and outcome of patients with both diseases, particularly since the advent of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) for HIV infection.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed our tumor registry to ascertain cases with concurrent lung cancer and HIV diagnoses since 1996, at the advent of HAART. Twenty-nine patients were identified at the University of Maryland, and five additional cases from an affiliated institution were identified.

Results: Thirty patients had non-small cell lung cancer, and four patients had small cell lung cancer. Of the 30 patients with non-small cell lung cancer, 27 had stage IIIb/IV disease and were analyzed for outcome on the basis of CD4 counts and HAART therapy. Patients with CD4 counts >200 or those on HAART had numerically, though not statistically, superior survival. Patients were able to receive standard chemotherapy regimens, and the overall survival was 5.2 months.

Conclusions: This single-institution analysis appears to indicate that there is an increasing incidence of patients with lung cancer and HIV infection. Patients with advanced NSCLC who are HIV positive with CD4 counts >200 can be treated with chemotherapy and demonstrate survival comparable to that of patients without HIV infection.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.JTO.0000263707.31202.d7DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lung cancer
32
patients
12
hiv infection
12
cell lung
12
cd4 counts
12
lung
8
highly active
8
active antiretroviral
8
antiretroviral therapy
8
20th century
8

Similar Publications

The current (and possible future) role of opioid analgesia in lung cancer surgery.

Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol

March 2024

Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10028, USA. Electronic address:

The objectives of this minireview are two-fold. The first is to discuss the evolution of opioid analgesia in perioperative medicine in the context of thoracic non-cardiac surgery. Current standard-of-care, aiming to optimize analgesia and limit undesirable side effects, is discussed in the context of multimodal analgesia, specifically enhanced recovery after thoracic surgery pathways.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Robotic bronchoscopy: Evolution of advanced diagnostic technologies for pulmonary lesions.

Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol

March 2024

1400 Holcombe Blvd, FC 13.2000, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. Electronic address:

Lung cancer is among one of the most commonly diagnosed malignancies and is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in both men and women globally, with an estimated 1.8 million deaths annually. Moreover, it is also the leading cause of cancer related deaths in the United States (U.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Large-scale gene-environment interaction (GxE) discovery efforts often involve analytical compromises for the sake of data harmonization and statistical power. Refinement of exposures, covariates, outcomes, and population subsets may be helpful to establish often-elusive replication and evaluate potential clinical utility. Here, we used additional datasets, an expanded set of statistical models, and interrogation of lipoprotein metabolism via nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)-based lipoprotein subfractions to refine a previously discovered GxE modifying the relationship between physical activity (PA) and HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between body composition, overall survival, odds of receiving treatment, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in individuals living with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (mNSCLC).

Methods: This retrospective analysis was conducted in newly diagnosed patients with mNSCLC who had computed-tomography (CT) scans and completed PRO questionnaires close to metastatic diagnosis date. Cox proportional hazard models and logistic regression evaluated overall survival and odds of receiving treatment, respectively.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!