A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Subtraction of background damage in PFGE experiments on DNA fragment-size distributions. | LitMetric

The non-random distribution of DNA breakage in pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) experiments poses a problem of proper subtraction of the background damage to obtain a fragment-size distribution due to radiation only. As been pointed out by various authors, a naive bin-to-bin subtraction of the background signal will not result in the right DNA mass distribution histogram, and may even result in negative values. Previous more systematic subtraction methods have been based mainly on random breakage, appropriate for low-LET radiation but problematic for high LET. Moreover, an investigation is needed whether the background breakage itself is random or non-random. Previously a new generalized formalism based on stochastic processes for the subtraction of the background damage in PFGE experiments for any LET and any background was proposed, and as now applied it to a set of PFGE data for Fe ions. We developed a Monte Carlo algorithm to compare the naïve subtraction procedure in artificial data sets to the result produced by the new formalism. The simulated data corresponded to various cases, involving non-random (high-LET) or random radiation breakage and random or non-random background breakage. The formalism systematically gives better results than naïve bin-by-bin subtraction in all these artificial data sets.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00411-007-0098-zDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

subtraction background
16
background damage
12
pfge experiments
12
damage pfge
8
background breakage
8
breakage random
8
random non-random
8
artificial data
8
data sets
8
subtraction
7

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!