Background: New immigrants and foreign-born residents add to the burden of pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) in low-incidence countries. The highest TB rates have been found among recent immigrants. Active screening programs are likely to change the clinical presentation of TB, but the extent of the difference between immigrant and resident populations has not been studied prospectively.

Methods: Adult new immigrants were screened upon entry to 1 of 5 immigration centers in Switzerland. Immigrants with abnormal chest radiographs were enrolled and compared in a cohort study to consecutive admitted foreign-born residents from moderate-to-high incidence countries and native residents presenting with suspected TB.

Results: Of 42,601 new immigrants screened, 112 had chest radiographs suspicious for TB. They were compared with foreign-born residents (n=118) and native residents (n=155) with suspected TB (n=385 patients included). Active TB was confirmed in 40.5% of all patients (immigrants 38.4%, foreign-born residents 50%, native residents 34.8%). Clinical signs and symptoms of TB and laboratory markers of inflammation were significantly less common in immigrants than in the other groups with normal results in >70%. The proportion of positive results on rapid testing to detect M. tuberculosis (MTB) in 3 respiratory specimens was significantly lower in immigrants (34.9% for acid-fast staining; 55.8% for polymerase chain reaction) compared with foreign-born residents (76.2% and 89.1%, respectively) and native residents (83.3% and 90.9%, respectively). Isoniazid resistance and multi-drug resistance were more prevalent in immigrants.

Conclusion: New immigrants with TB detected in a screening program are often asymptomatic and have a low yield of rapid diagnostic tests but are at higher risk for resistant MTB strains. Postmigration follow-up of pulmonary infiltrates is essential in order to control TB among immigrants, even in the absence of clinical and laboratory signs of infection.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2006.10.025DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

foreign-born residents
24
native residents
20
immigrants
11
residents
11
immigrants foreign-born
8
immigrants screened
8
chest radiographs
8
compared foreign-born
8
foreign-born
6
native
5

Similar Publications

Background/objectives: Spain has been in a measles elimination phase since 2014. No evidence exists about the distribution of measles cases among the population born outside Spain. The aim of this study was thus to describe the epidemiological situation of measles, stratified by place of birth, during the post-elimination period in Spain.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The number of foreign-born patients with tuberculosis (TB) has been increasing in Japan, and the number of Vietnamese patients was the highest in 2019. Tuberculosis (TB) is the second leading cause of death from infectious diseases after coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). As the prevalence of TB varies widely globally, measures must be tailored to local characteristics.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The United States has more foreign-born (FB) individuals than any other country and a large international medical graduate (IMG) workforce. Yet little is known about the trends of FB IMGs matching into primary care specialties residency programs or the alignment between FB individuals and FB IMGs.

Objective: This study examined the recent trends in FB IMGs entry into primary care specialty residency programs and their distribution in relation to the US FB population.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The foreign-born population in the U.S. is growing, but recent statistics on breastfeeding behaviors by race/ethnicity and immigration status are lacking.
  • This study used data from the National Survey of Children's Health (2021-2022) to analyze breastfeeding trends among foreign-born and U.S.-born NH Black, NH White, and Hispanic women with children aged 6 months to 5 years.
  • Results showed that foreign-born women breastfed more at 6 months than U.S.-born NH White women, but there was no significant difference in exclusive breastfeeding rates, highlighting the need for targeted interventions, especially for U.S.-born Hispanic women.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!