Testing and reporting ACMG cystic fibrosis mutation panel results.

Genet Test

Department of Pathology, Akron Children's Hospital, Akron, OH 44308-1062, USA.

Published: May 2007

Testing strategies and summary reports for pregnant patients and symptomatic patients being tested for cystic fibrosis (CF; MIM 219700) were developed based upon calculated after (posterior) test risk tables incorporating patient and family histories, ethnicities, and prior testing status. This manuscript defines the proportion of all mutations detected by the American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG)-recommended 23-mutation cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene core panel when testing all patient categories with severe symptoms, including pregnant couples with no family history as well as CF patients, their partners, and other family members. Reference tables incorporate prior and posterior test risks sufficient to complete >99% of all tested cases and to report the results according to HIPAA guidelines. These tables were calculated based on the assumption that all patient samples have been collected, labeled, analyzed, and reported correctly, including the patient's reported relationship to a known affected or carrier relative, even though the template letter states that the likelihood is about 99% that each reported result is accurate. Pedigrees and tables with the prior (before; a priori) test risks of patients offered CF screening with a family history of a CF patient and/or a known carrier patient are provided for ready reference with each risk frequency, dependent upon the assumption that the patient's pedigree reflects familial relationships correctly. Comparison of tables emphasizes the value of asking the tested partner to ask a relative known to have CF or who tested positive for a CF mutation to donate a sample as a DNA test control and/or to obtain a copy of a prior molecular test result and/or extracted DNA sample. These tables posterior test risks also indicate that when one partner with no family history tests negative for the 23 mutation panel, no further prenatal testing is indicated.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/gte.2006.9996DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cystic fibrosis
12
posterior test
12
family history
12
test risks
12
mutation panel
8
panel testing
8
test
6
tables
6
testing
5
patient
5

Similar Publications

Chronic infections represent a significant global health and economic challenge. Biofilms, which are bacterial communities encased in an extracellular polysaccharide matrix, contribute to approximately 80% of these infections. In particular, pathogens such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus are frequently co-isolated from the sputum of patients with cystic fibrosis and are commonly found in chronic wound infections.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Dry eye disease and morphological changes in the anterior chamber in people with cystic fibrosis.

J Cyst Fibros

January 2025

Pulmonology Department, Regional University Hospital of Malaga, Department of Medicine and Dermatology, University of Malaga, Biomedical Research Institute of Malaga (IBIMA) - Bionand Platform, Malaga, Spain. Electronic address:

Background: Cystic fibrosis (CF) is caused by variants in a gene that encodes a protein essential for water and ion transport in the epithelial cells of exocrine organs. Given the possible relationship of this protein and conjunctival and corneal epithelium, the aim of this study was to evaluate ophthalmologic alterations in people with CF.

Methods: Forty-five people with CF underwent pulmonary evaluation including inflammatory score (IS).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aims: In cystic fibrosis lung transplant recipients (LTRs), graft dysfunction due to acute infections, rejection or chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) is difficult to distinguish. Characterisation of the airway inflammatory milieu could help detect and prevent graft dysfunction. We speculated that an eosinophil or neutrophil-rich milieu is associated with higher risk of CLAD.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Safety of steroids in severe community-acquired pneumonia.

Eur Respir Rev

January 2025

Hospital Clínic, Cellex Laboratory, CIBERES (Center for Networked Biomedical Research Respiratory Diseases, 06/06/0028), FCRB-Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), School of Medicine, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

The systemic use of corticosteroids for patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia (sCAP) remains controversial in clinical practice, particularly in terms of the safety profile of these drugs. This narrative review aims to analyse the available literature data concerning the safety of short-term steroid use in the treatment of sCAP, while also highlighting potential future research directions. Several trials and meta-analyses have evaluated corticosteroid therapy as an adjuvant treatment for sCAP, yielding heterogeneous results regarding its efficacy and safety.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Steroid rinses and steroid-eluting stents are both options for preventing postoperative stenosis after frontal sinus surgery. This study aimed to assess whether steroid-eluting stents offer added benefit over steroid rinses alone in postoperative healing and long-term frontal sinus patency.

Methods: A randomized controlled trial enrolled patients with CRS with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) who underwent surgery for bilateral and equal frontal sinusitis after failing prior medical therapy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!