Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
This paper presents a quick chlorophyll fluorescence method for the estimation of the influence of some adjuvants applied with Azoprim 50WP (a.s. atrazine) or Buramet 70WG (a.s. metamitron) on oat plants. These herbicides inhibit photosynthetic electron transport in photosystem II, which was measured by means of a pulse PAM-210 chlorophyll fluorometer. Results of the ETR measurements show differences between the efficacies of the studied adjuvants. Olemix 84EC, Atpolan 80EC, Adpros 85 SL and Break-Thru S-240 were the most effective in the mixture with Azoprim, and the last two--also in the mixture with Buramet. Olejan 85 EC did not change the biological action of Azoprim nor Buramet. Moreover, the most effective adjuvants showed relatively good stability.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!