A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

[New media - new prospects in psychotherapy process research: feedback of text-based processes in internet chat groups]. | LitMetric

Group psychotherapy via Internet-chat offers not only an optimisation of therapeutic service provision but also new prospects for process research. The communication content could be analysed automatically and therefore text-based process variables could be fed back to the therapist immediately. In a former study , different text-based process variables in therapeutic Internet-chat aftercare groups were validated and the best concurrent validity with psychometric group evaluations was found for the text-based process variable "Activity", operationalised by the number of words and statements that a patient writes during a chat session. Based on this result, Activity was used in this study for the development of a feedback given to the therapist. The feedback was given after the first half of the chat session to alert the therapist to inactive patients and to encourage him to a reflection of his therapeutic strategy. The feedback was given in four different Internet-chat aftercare groups and evaluated in a randomised controlled trial comprising 86 group sessions where the patients' group evaluations were compared between feedback and non-feedback sessions. In addition it was examined whether inactive patients from the first half of the group session were addressed more often by the therapist during the second half of the session and whether they were more active during the second half of the session. Even though the feedback was evaluated by the therapists as helpful in 68 % of the sessions and it resulted in therapeutic modifications in 40 % of the feedback-sessions, no effect on the patients' group evaluations or their activity during the second half of the session could be examined. The results and alternative feedback strategies are discussed.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-2006-952029DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

text-based process
12
group evaluations
12
second half
12
half session
12
process variables
8
internet-chat aftercare
8
aftercare groups
8
chat session
8
inactive patients
8
patients' group
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!