A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

[Effects of rhubarb and different routes of nutrition support on invasive fungal infection]. | LitMetric

[Effects of rhubarb and different routes of nutrition support on invasive fungal infection].

Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue

Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, Shanghai 200003, China.

Published: March 2007

Objective: To study the effects of rhubarb and the different routes of nutrition support on invasive fungal infection.

Methods: One thousand and ninety patients, who suffered from sepsis subsequent to trauma, shock and infection were enrolled in this study. The patients were randomly divided into two groups, 637 cases in rhubarb preventive treatment group and 453 cases in non-preventive rhubarb treatment group. They were again divided into four subgroups: enteral nutrition support, and no nutrition support group. The incidence of invasive fungal infection was observed in those groups.

Results: The incidence of invasive fungal infection in rhubarb preventive treatment group (3.0%) was much lower than that in non-preventive rhubarb treatment group (11.5%). There was significant difference between two groups (P<0.05). Furthermore, fewer patients developed invasive fungal infection in enteral nutrition support and enteral combined parenteral nutrition support subgroups after preventive rhubarb treatment (0.9% and 2.1%), compared with parenteral nutrition support and no nutrition support subgroups (30.4% and 61.3%) and corresponding subgroups with non-preventive treatment of rhubarb (3.9% and 7.1%, P<0.05 or P<0.01). In addition, the route of nutrition support also affected the incidence of invasive fungal infection. Patients in enteral nutrition support and enteral combined parenteral nutrition support subgroups had lower incidence of invasive fungal infection than in parenteral nutrition support and no nutrition support subgroups (all P<0.05), and the incidence was the highest in no nutrition support subgroup. There were no significant difference between parenteral nutrition support and no nutrition support subgroups.

Conclusion: Rhubarb and enteral nutrition support have preventive effects on invasive fungal infection via gut mechanism.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

nutrition support
16
invasive fungal
16
treatment group
16
rhubarb routes
8
routes nutrition
8
support invasive
8
rhubarb preventive
8
preventive treatment
8
non-preventive rhubarb
8
rhubarb treatment
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!