A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Midterm response with latanoprost therapy in german ocular hypertension patients. | LitMetric

Purpose: The purpose of this prospective observational trial was to report the analysis of the midterm efficacy, safety, and discontinuation rates of a cohort of ocular hypertensive patients treated with latanoprost in Germany.

Methods: A subanalysis of patients with ocular hypertension who were previously treated on latanoprost monotherapy and continued within the study on this same medication for at least 6 months.

Results: 353 patients with ocular hypertension were included and treated with latanoprost monotherapy historically (1.4 +/- 1.3 years) and within the observational period of the study for a mean of 2.2 +/- 1.1 years. On latanoprost only, the average intraocular pressure at study entry was 18.4 +/- 2.7 mm Hg, and at 6 months the intraocular pressure was 18.3 +/- 2.3 mmHg (p = 0.54). During the observational period, the most common ocular side effect was conjunctival hyperemia (20.7%), and the most common systemic side effect was fatigue (3.1%). Nineteen patients (5.4%) discontinued latanoprost with the most common reason being insufficient efficacy (3.1%). Physician assessments of latanoprost monotherapy were "very good" to "excellent" for patient efficacy (75.2%), tolerability (83.8%), and patient satisfaction (82.1%).

Conclusions: The study suggests that patients with ocular hypertension already treated with latanoprost monotherapy will continue to have, on average, at least midterm stable pressures, low incidence of side effects and discontinuations, as well as "very good" to "excellent" physician ratings of efficacy, tolerability, and patient satisfaction.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02713680601077053DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ocular hypertension
16
treated latanoprost
16
latanoprost monotherapy
16
patients ocular
12
latanoprost
8
hypertension treated
8
+/- years
8
observational period
8
intraocular pressure
8
"very good"
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!