AI Article Synopsis

  • Patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcomas (MSTS) often have a poor prognosis, even after responding to standard doxorubicin-based chemotherapy. Researchers conducted a phase II study on high-dose chemotherapy and stem cell rescue for those who responded favorably to initial treatment.
  • Out of 55 patients treated, 38% showed positive responses (3 complete, 18 partial), and most proceeded to receive high-dose chemotherapy followed by stem cell reinfusion, with manageable side effects but no toxic deaths reported.
  • After an average follow-up of 30 months, the median progression-free survival was 12 months, and overall survival was 22 months, showing that high-dose chemotherapy (HD-ICE) could improve outcomes, suggesting

Article Abstract

Background: Prognosis of patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcomas (MSTS) is poor even after response to doxorubicin-based chemotherapy. We report phase II data of high-dose chemotherapy and peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) rescue in patients with MSTS responding to AI-G chemotherapy.

Patients And Methods: From 1997 to 2002, 55 patients with MSTS were prospectively treated with 4 cycles of AI-G (doxorubicin 75 mg/m(2), ifosfamide 6 g/m(2) with G-CSF support). Responders received 2 further cycles of AI-G with collection of PBSCs. High-dose chemotherapy consisted of ifosfamide 12 g/m(2), carboplatin 1.2 g/m(2) and etoposide 1.2 g/m(2) (HD-ICE) followed by reinfusion of PBSCs.

Results: Twenty-one of 55 patients (38%) were assessed as responders (3 complete response, 18 partial response). All but 2 patients refusing treatment received high-dose chemotherapy with PBSC rescue leading to grade IV hematologic toxicity without severe infections in all patients. No toxic death occurred. After a median follow-up time of 30 months, the median progression-free time was 12 months and survival time was 22 months for the entire group. By intent-to-treat analysis the probability of 5-year progression-free survival was significantly higher for patients allocated to HD-ICE compared to patients receiving second-line chemotherapy after failure of AI-G (14 vs. 3%; p = 0.003). The estimated 5-year overall survival between the 2 groups was different (27% vs. not reached) but did not reach significance (p = 0.08).

Conclusion: HD-ICE is feasible and promising in patients with chemosensitive MSTS. A randomized phase III trial is warranted to further define the role of HD-ICE as consolidation treatment in these patients.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000100447DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

high-dose chemotherapy
16
time months
12
patients
11
peripheral blood
8
blood stem
8
stem cell
8
patients metastatic
8
metastatic soft
8
soft tissue
8
tissue sarcomas
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!