Background: We describe immediate reinitiation of macroreentry ventricular tachycardia (VT) involving the His-Purkinje system by ventricular pacing from the electrode of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) as a mechanism of VT storm refractory to ICD therapy.
Methods And Results: Repetitive reinitiation of bundle branch reentry tachycardia (BBRT), interfascicular tachycardia, or both VTs by ventricular pacing was identified in four ICD patients presenting with VT storm or incessant VT. All patients had a pre-existing prolonged HV interval (75 +/- 9 ms) and left bundle branch block (LBBB) or bifascicular block during sinus rhythm. The VTs included BBRT with LBBB in three patients and interfascicular tachycardia with right bundle branch block (RBBB) and left anterior or left posterior fascicular block in two patients. The paced beats from the ICD electrode exhibited a LBBB pattern of depolarization in two patients and a RBBB contour in V1 and V2 with left axis deviation in two patients. The QRS complex during pacing from the ICD electrode closely resembled that of the recurrent VT in all four patients suggesting that the pacing site of the ICD electrode was in proximity to the myocardial exit site of the bundle fascicle used for antegrade conduction during the reinitiated VT. Ventricular pacing from the ICD electrode after termination of the VT apparently encountered the retrograde refractoriness of this bundle fascicle and allowed immediate re-propagation of the wavefront orthodromically along the VT circuit. BBRT was eliminated by ablation of the right bundle branch. Successful ablation of the interfascicular tachycardias was achieved by targeting (1) an abnormal potential of the distal left posterior Purkinje network or (2) a diastolic potential during VT in the midinferior left ventricular (LV) septum.
Conclusions: Repetitive reinitiation of BBRT and interfascicular tachycardia by ventricular pacing from the ICD electrode should be considered as a mechanism of VT storm refractory to ICD therapy in patients with a pre-existing conduction delay within the His-Purkinje system.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.2007.00654.x | DOI Listing |
Eur Heart J Case Rep
January 2025
Department of Cardiology, Yokohama City University Hospital, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-Ku, Yokohama city, Kanagawa 236-0004, Japan.
Background: Coronary sinus (CS) lead placement in persistent left superior vena cava (PLSVC) cases is challenging because of the poor backup force of the guiding catheter within the enlarged CS. Active fixation Quadripolar leads (Attain Stability™ Quad 4798, Medtronic) can expand choice to CS branches with limited access; however, no cases of anchoring to the main body of the CS have been published to date.
Case Summary: We describe a case of cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemaker upgrade in a 79-year-old female who developed pacing-induced cardiomyopathy after pacemaker implantation via the right superior vena cava (SVC) for atrioventricular block eight years ago wherein PLSVC was revealed during the procedure.
Cardiol Young
January 2025
Department of Medical Education and Clinical Sciences, Elson S Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State University, Spokane, WA, USA.
Sudden cardiac death poses a significant risk in patients with surgically repaired tetralogy of Fallot. Despite extensive research, risk stratification practices vary. This study surveyed the Pediatric and Adult Congenital Electrophysiology Society to identify these differences.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPacing Clin Electrophysiol
January 2025
Department of Cardiology, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, People's Republic of China.
Background: The evidence in the primary prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD) by using implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) is well-established but remains controversial for those with nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM). This study evaluates whether prognostic differences exist between ICM and NICM patients after ICD implantation.
Methods: Patients initially undergoing ICD implantation as primary SCD prevention were retrospectively enrolled from January 2017 to May 2023.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol
January 2025
Aurora Cardiovascular and Thoracic Services, Aurora Sinai/Aurora St. Luke's Medical Centers, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
Background: Concurrent Micra leadless pacemaker (Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota) implantation and atrioventricular node (AVN) ablation has been shown to be feasible and safe in patients with symptomatic, drug-refractory atrial fibrillation (AF). However, major complications within the 30 days after concurrent Micra implantation and AVN ablation have been reported. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of the concurrent procedure at our institution.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPacing Clin Electrophysiol
January 2025
Second Division of Cardiology, Cardiac-Thoracic and Vascular Department, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
This case details the successful implantation of a leadless pacemaker following the extraction of transvenous leads in a 72-year-old female patient with a complex cardiovascular history. The patient had undergone a series of cardiac interventions, including a recent percutaneous tricuspid valve repair with a metal clip implant due to severe regurgitation. After presenting with an infection at the pacemaker site, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus hominis was identified, necessitating the removal of the entire pacing system.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!