A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Significance of additional ST segment elevation in patients with no reflow after angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. | LitMetric

Objectives: We sought to evaluate the incidence, timing, and clinical significance of additional increase in ST segment elevation (ST-SE) in patients showing no reflow after angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction.

Methods: We studied 26 patients with acute myocardial infarction showing myocardial contrast echocardiography no reflow after successful angioplasty. Baseline and 6-month 2-dimensional echocardiograms were obtained in 21 surviving patients.

Results: After angioplasty, 13 patients showed greater than 30% additional increase in ST-SE (group 1), whereas 13 did not (group 2). Baseline clinical, echographic, and angiographic characteristics, and 6-month patency and restenosis rate, were similar between the two groups. From baseline to 6 months, a similar global and regional systolic function was found between the two groups, whereas a higher increase in left ventricular end-diastolic volume occurred in group 1 (135 +/- 45 vs 168 +/- 42 mL, P = .033). The additional increase in ST-SE was not associated with more severe microvascular damage (myocardial contrast echocardiography score index: 0.14 +/- 0.26 vs 0.22 +/- 0.27), higher peak creatine kinase value (4888 +/- 2533 vs 3109 +/- 2055 U/L, P = .061), higher incidence of left ventricular remodeling (73% vs 60%, P = .537), or worse outcome (26 +/- 24 months) such as death (15% vs 23%, P = .619), hospitalization for heart failure (8% vs 23%, P = .277), or reinfarction (8% vs 0%, P = .308).

Conclusions: Our data show that in patients showing no reflow after angioplasty a transient additional increase in ST-SE occurs in half of patients. The prognostic value of additional increase in ST-SE remains uncertain in the era of primary angioplasty.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2006.08.015DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

additional increase
20
increase st-se
16
reflow angioplasty
12
acute myocardial
12
significance additional
8
segment elevation
8
angioplasty acute
8
myocardial infarction
8
patients showing
8
showing reflow
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!