Consequences of Directive 2001/20/EC for investigator-initiated trials in the paediatric population--a field report.

Eur J Pediatr

Department of Neonatology and Paediatric Intensive Care, University of Cologne, Children's Hospital, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.

Published: November 2007

On 4 April 2001, the European Parliament and Council enacted Directive 2001/20/EC, which had to be implemented in the national law of the European Union member states by May 2004. Its aim was to improve the quality of clinical trials and to assure the safety and well-being of trial subjects. We recently initiated the first paediatric investigator-initiated trial (IIT) at the University Hospital of Cologne according to Directive 2001/20/EC. This field report demonstrates the consequences and implications of the directive for paediatric IITs. Based on our experience, we agree that Directive 2001/20/EC improves the quality of clinical trials and assures the safety and well-being of trial subjects. However, at the same time, performing an IIT according to the new requirements is nearly impossible for clinicians and academic researchers without cooperating with expensive specialised experts, such as project managers, statisticians, data managers, pharmacists and monitors. Therefore, it is absolutely mandatory that financial support for paediatric IITs be adapted and increased in order to be able to meet the new requirements and obligations. Regulation (EC) No 141/2000 on orphan medicinal products and the recently adopted regulation on medicinal products for paediatric use (Paediatric Regulation) are important steps in improving clinical research in children. However, both regulations mainly encourage clinical research carried out by the pharmaceutical industry, whereas paediatric IITs are not in the scope of this legislation. We need to develop new concepts for funding to ensure future paediatric IITs, for example through specific grants from the European Union or member states.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00431-007-0434-yDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

directive 2001/20/ec
16
paediatric iits
16
paediatric
8
field report
8
european union
8
union member
8
member states
8
quality clinical
8
clinical trials
8
safety well-being
8

Similar Publications

Background: Phenotypic data comparison is essential for disease association studies, patient stratification, and genotype-phenotype correlation analysis. To support these efforts, the Global Alliance for Genomics and Health (GA4GH) established Phenopackets v2 and Beacon v2 standards for storing, sharing, and discovering genomic and phenotypic data. These standards provide a consistent framework for organizing biological data, simplifying their transformation into computer-friendly formats.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study investigates the scientific evaluation of Nordic Spirit nicotine pouches, focusing on their unique composition and how they compare to traditional tobacco products.
  • Researchers assessed the blood nicotine delivery, pharmacokinetics, subjective effects, and safety of three different strengths of Nordic Spirit pouches against low-dose tobacco snus and Nicorette gum.
  • Results showed that Nordic Spirit NPs delivered nicotine in a dose-dependent manner without significant safety concerns, suggesting their potential for safe human use and further product development.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background And Objective: Remdesivir is a nucleotide analog prodrug approved for the treatment of COVID-19. This study evaluated the pharmacokinetics and safety of remdesivir and its metabolites (GS-704277 and GS-441524) in participants with varying degrees of renal impairment. Results of this phase I study, along with those of a phase III study, contributed to an extension of indication for remdesivir in the USA and Europe for use in patients with COVID-19 with all stages of renal impairment, including those on dialysis, with no dose adjustment.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Regulation (EU) 536/2014 and the role of ethics committees: a proposal for a review system model.

BMJ Open

November 2024

Bioethics Unit, Istituto Superiore di Sanita, Rome, Lazio, Italy.

Independent ethics committees play an important role in clinical trials as well as in all health-related research. Internationally, the national laws of the individual countries have guided their local development and organisation over the decades. Directive 2001/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council explicitly recognised the ethics committees' duty to protect the rights, safety and well-being of human subjects involved in trials and to provide public assurance of that protection.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) cotreatment used to transiently suppress ovarian function during chemotherapy to prevent ovarian damage and preserve female fertility is used globally but efficacy is debated. Most clinical studies investigating a beneficial effect of GnRHa cotreatment on ovarian function have been small, retrospective and uncontrolled. Unblinded randomised studies on women with breast cancer have suggested a beneficial effect, but results are mixed with lack of evidence of improvement in markers of ovarian reserve.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!