Comparative drug effects: the case of GERD therapies.

Dis Manag

School of Pharmacy, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Published: February 2007

The results of clinical trials and approved Food and Drug Administration Drug Applications inform decision makers that a drug was effective in its labeled indications without causing unacceptable side effects. But purchasers for large medical organizations and members of health insurer or managed care organizations need relative effectiveness data to enable them to select the product from among the four, six, or ten competing alternative drug products available in that family. Retrospective studies are capable of providing this data after about a year of use by utilizing a database containing a large number of patients. An alternative means of determining this was explored using a new technique from a nationwide patient satisfaction study. Using GERD as an example, the authors were able to determine differences in patient satisfaction between proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), H(2) antagonists, and antacids, and even within the PPI category, down to individual products. The piloted method is rapid and inexpensive and can be an alternative for clinicians developing disease management protocols for specific conditions.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/dis.2006.621DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

patient satisfaction
8
comparative drug
4
drug effects
4
effects case
4
case gerd
4
gerd therapies
4
therapies clinical
4
clinical trials
4
trials approved
4
approved food
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!