Introduction: The VRAG is an actuarial risk assessment instrument, developed in Canada as an aid to estimating the probability of reoffending by mentally ill offenders.

Aim: To test the predictive validity of the VRAG with a German sample.

Method: The predictive validity of the VRAG was tested on a sample of 136 people charged with a criminal offence and under evaluation for criminal responsibility in the forensic psychiatry department at the University of Munich in 1994-95. The predicted outcome was tested by means of ROC analysis for correlation with the observed rate of recidivism between discharge after the 1994-95 assessment and the census date of 31 March 2003. Recidivism rate was calculated from the official records of the National Conviction Registry.

Results: Just over 38% of the sample had reoffended by 2003. Their mean time-at-risk was 58 months (SD 3.391; range 0-115 months). The VRAG yielded a high predictive accuracy in the ROC analysis with an AUC of 0.703. For a constant time-at-risk < = 7 years, the predicted probability and observed rates of recidivism correlated significantly with Pearson's r = 0.941.

Conclusions: The validity of the VRAG was replicated with a German sample. The VRAG yielded good predictive accuracy, despite differences in sample and outcome variables compared with its original sample.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cbm.644DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

validity vrag
12
predictive validity
8
roc analysis
8
vrag yielded
8
predictive accuracy
8
vrag
7
sample
5
validity
4
validity violence
4
violence risk
4

Similar Publications

Evaluation of whether commonly used risk assessment tools are applicable to women in forensic psychiatric institutions.

Compr Psychiatry

November 2024

Irina Franke, Psychiatric Services of Grisons, Chur, Switzerland. Electronic address:

Objective: By providing a structured assessment of specific risk factors, risk assessment tools allow statements to be made about the likelihood of future recidivism in people who have committed a crime. These tools were originally developed for and primarily tested in men and are mainly based on the usual criminological background of men. Despite significant progress in the last decade, there is still a lack of empirical research on female offenders, especially female forensic psychiatric inpatients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

We examined the long-term risk for stalking recidivism and the predictive validity of ratings made using the Guidelines for Stalking Assessment and Management (SAM) in 100 stalking offenders from a forensic clinic. Overall, 45 offenders were convicted of, charged with, or the subject of police investigation for stalking-related offenses during a potential time at risk that averaged 13.47 years.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Numerous validation studies support the use of the interRAI Mental Health (MH) assessment system for inpatient mental health assessment, triage, treatment planning, and outcome measurement. However, there have been suggestions that the interRAI MH does not include sufficient content relevant to forensic mental health. We address this potential deficiency through the development of a Forensic Supplement (FS) to the interRAI MH system.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The VRAG-R is a well-established actuarial risk-assessment instrument, which was originally developed for assessing violent recidivism risk in adult male offenders. Whether or not the VRAG-R can also predict violent recidivism in young offenders is unclear so far. In the emergence of juvenile offending, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) seems to be of major importance suggesting that it could be relevant for risk assessment as well.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

[Violence risk assessment in forensic patients using HCR-20v3: interrater reliability and concurrent validity].

Vertex

March 2021

Doctora en Psicología Clínica y de la Salud. Instituto de Investigaciones Psicológicas, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. E-mail:

This study provides evidence on the inter-rater reliability and concurrent validity of the Historical, Clinical and Risk Management-20, Version 3 (HCR-20V3) in a sample of 35 patients admitted to a forensic psychiatric unit in Argentina. The HCR-20V3 showed significant correlations with the VRAG-R and the PCL: SV. HCR-20V3 was independently coded by two evaluators in 15 patients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!