Field studies in pesticide registration: questioning the answers.

Integr Environ Assess Manag

National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Antonie van Leeuwenhoeklaan 9, PO. Box 1, NL-3720BA, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.

Published: January 2007

The principal conclusion of a workshop in October 2005 at RIVM (Bilthoven, The Netherlands) on the assessment of field studies with pesticides for authorization is that the lack of a definition of acceptability of effects is recognized as a problem by all stakeholders: Industry, risk assessors, and regulators. Because of this lack of definition in the legislation, it is unclear what critical effect values should be assessed in field studies. Despite the extensive documentation on field study performance, the decision making is not based on justifiable scientific opinions or publicly shared values but on technical limitations of the test design instead. In the workshop, research was identified that should result in a scientific basis for value judgments applied in decision making.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

field studies
12
lack definition
8
decision making
8
field
4
studies pesticide
4
pesticide registration
4
registration questioning
4
questioning answers
4
answers principal
4
principal conclusion
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!