Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
In the context of inverse electrocardiography, we examine the problem of using measurements from sets of electrocardiographic leads that are smaller than the number of nodes in the associated geometric models of the torso. We compared several methods to estimate the solution from such reduced-lead measurements sets both with and without knowledge of prior statistics of the measurements. We present here simulation results that indicate that deleting rows of the forward matrix corresponding to the unmeasured leads performs best in the absence of prior statistics, and that Bayesian (or least-squares) estimation performs best in the presence of prior statistics.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2006.886865 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!