Background And Objectives: To validate accuracy and reproducibility of the Perkins tonometer, pneumatonometer, and Tono-Pen XL (Medtronic Solan, Jacksonville, FL) in estimating intraocular pressure (IOP) in rabbits.
Materials And Methods: IOP was increased from 5 to 50 mm Hg in 5-mm increments. Measurements were compared to readings of two digital manometers simultaneously measuring real IOP in the anterior chamber and vitreous cavity. Interobserver accuracy was evaluated using 4 eyes with the Perkins tonometer.
Results: The Perkins tonometer and Tono-Pen XL underestimated IOP and were more accurate at pressures less than 30 mm Hg. No statistically significant difference was found between real IOP and Tono-Pen XL readings. The pneumatonometer overestimated pressures in the low ranges but was accurate at pressures greater than 40 mm Hg. The Tono-Pen XL had more variability than the Perkins tonometer and pneumatonometer at high IOP.
Conclusions: None of the tonometers are accurate or reproducible in estimating IOP in rabbits over the tested range. Pneumatonometry, although not very accurate, has the advantage of having acceptable variability.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/15428877-20070101-06 | DOI Listing |
Arq Bras Oftalmol
November 2024
Department of Ophthalmology, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Purpose: To compare objective and subjective intraocular pressure measurements immediately after cataract surgery and intraocular pressure measurements between less experienced surgeons (Group 1) and experienced surgeons (Group 2).
Methods: Surgeons were asked to estimate the IOP after corneal sealing after surgery based on their tactile perception of eye tension (subjective intraocular pressure) Objective intraocular pressure was measured using a Perkins tonometer while patients were still in the surgical field. Objective intraocular pressure was compared to subjective intraocular pressure.
J Clin Med
July 2023
Instituto Universitario Fernández-Vega, Fundación de Investigación Oftalmológica, Universidad de Oviedo, 33012 Oviedo, Spain.
Background: The mechanism that could increase intraocular pressure (IOP) during scleral lens (SL) wear is not fully understood, although it may be related to compression of the landing zone on structures involved in aqueous humor drainage.
Methods: Thirty healthy subjects were fitted with two SLs of different sizes (L1 = 15.8 mm, L2 = 16.
Int Ophthalmol
October 2023
Ophthalmology Unit, Department of Inmunology, Ophthalmology and ORL, Faculty of Medicine, Hospital Clinico San-Carlos, Universidad Complutense de Madrid and Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San-Carlos (IdISSC), Calle del Prof Martín Lagos, s/n, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Objective: To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained using the new transpalpebral Easyton® tonometer and Perkins applanation tonometer (PAT) in three different clinical populations.
Methods: The participants of this prospective study were 84 subjects divided into the groups: 22 healthy children (G1), 42 healthy adults (G2), and 20 adult patients with primary open angle glaucoma (G3). The data recorded in 84 eyes of these subjects were age, sex, gender, central corneal thickness (CCT), and axial length (AL).
J Fr Ophtalmol
November 2023
CHU Nord Marseille, chemin des Bourrely, 13015 Marseille, France.
Introduction: The goal of the study was to compare Perkins applanation tonometry and iCare rebound tonometry, evaluating their correlation and agreement in a diverse pediatric population under general anaesthesia (GA).
Materials And Methods: Children undergoing an eye examination under GA between November 2019 and March 2020 were included. Intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured successively using the Perkins applanation tonometer and the iCare IC200 rebound tonometer.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!