Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 144
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 144
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 212
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1002
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3142
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Forty patients with 51 knee arthroplasties after high tibial osteotomy were compared with a matched group of patients with primary knee arthroplasties. Patients were matched according to length of follow-up, age, sex, prosthetic design, and surgeon. At an average of 12.6 years, the patients were reviewed and assessed clinically using the Hospital for Special Surgery scoring system. Radiologic assessment was also performed. Although the overall Hospital for Special Surgery scores showed no significant difference between the 2 groups, there were more patients in the osteotomy group with a poor result (P = .027), significantly reduced flexion (P = .006), and higher reoperation rate. There were more failures after high tibial osteotomy. Failures tend to occur in the medium to long term, emphasizing the importance of long-term follow-up.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2006.01.031 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!