A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Binaural hearing, atresia, and the masking dilemma. | LitMetric

Binaural hearing, atresia, and the masking dilemma.

Int Tinnitus J

Ceres Biotechnology, LLC, Richmond, Virginia, USA.

Published: June 2007

A masking dilemma occurs when energy from a non-test ear crosses over the head to a test ear. In cases of bilateral atresia, obtaining thresholds on the poorer ear is problematic. Near threshold, however, sufficient ear-bone isolation exists to test with validity but not so much above threshold, even for the ultra-high (> 10 kHz) frequencies. This aspect of the bone audiogram should not be overlooked. We suggest two uses of binaural bone conduction hearing to help resolve the dilemma--one an auditory brainstem response variation, the other a high-frequency lateralization procedure. Both are also applicable in unilateral atresia with and without a sensorineural component. The use of an insert earphone for masking in the unobstructed ear will provide adequate interaural attenuation to resolve most but not all dilemmas. That is to say, the maximum isolation of an insert earplug is on the order of 100 dB, so it has a limit. The dilemma extends through the ultra-high frequencies (> 10 kHz) because the intra-aural attenuation is no more than 10 dB. In the cited case of unilateral congenital atresia of the external ear, the intra-aural threshold differences in the high frequencies plus the resolution of the masking dilemma in the low frequencies (without the need for more masking) leads us to conclude that the unmasked thresholds are valid. Masking can be extended above 10 kHz, but this is not generally within the capacity of commercial audiometers, a feature that should be included.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

masking dilemma
12
masking
6
ear
5
binaural hearing
4
atresia
4
hearing atresia
4
atresia masking
4
dilemma
4
dilemma masking
4
dilemma occurs
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!