Cement restriction and pressurisation are helpful technical points in achieving a good cement mantle in cemented hip replacement. In this prospective study, we compared 39 cases where a Hardinge polyethylene restrictor was used and 33 cases where a bone block restrictor was used during Charnley hip replacement. The preoperative radiographs were templated, calibrated holders for the cement restrictors were used intraoperatively, keeping the distal cement height within 2-3 cm from the tip of the femoral prosthesis. Postoperative radiographs were analysed. The Harris Hip scoring system was used for clinical assessment of results. The preoperative target of having a distal cement height of 2-3 cm was achieved in only 60.6% of the bone block group and 30.6% of the Hardinge group. The difference between the two groups is statistically significant (p = 0.001). Distal migration of the restrictors more than 3 cm from the tip of the femoral prosthesis was associated with a non-homogenous cement mantle in zones 3, 4 and 5 without affecting zones 1, 2, 6 and 7. The cement mantle was adequate when the distal cement mantle remained within 2-3 cm of the tip of the femoral prosthesis.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cement mantle
20
distal cement
12
femoral prosthesis
12
cement
9
cement restrictors
8
restrictors femoral
8
hip replacement
8
bone block
8
cement height
8
height 2-3
8

Similar Publications

Cortical windows for implant and cement removal during revision total elbow arthroplasty.

JSES Int

November 2024

Division of Hand and Upper-Extremity Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Geisinger MSKI, Danville, PA, USA.

Background: Revision total elbow arthroplasty (rTEA) remains a technically challenging procedure with potential for substantial morbidity. Cases involving excessively long cement mantles, removal of well-fixed implants or infected revisions requiring complete cement removal introduce additional technical challenges. Our purpose was to describe the outcomes, results, and complications associated with the use of cortical windows in rTEA.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Mechanical studies for the rotational stability of a cemented stem in cases with stem anteversion adjustment in the cement mantle.

J Orthop Sci

November 2024

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nishinomya Kaisei Hospital, 1-4, Ohama-cho, Nishinomiya City, Hyogo, 662-0957, Japan. Electronic address:

Article Synopsis
  • The cemented stem is effective for various femur shapes and maintains stability, although increased cement viscosity during rotation can impact postoperative stability.
  • A study compared two cementing methods—static and rotating stems—using in vitro testing to measure rotational stability under load and repetitive strain.
  • Results showed no significant differences in rotational stability or torque between the static and rotating methods, suggesting that adjusting the stem's version angle before cement hardening does not adversely affect stability.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aseptic loosening of femoral and acetabular components is a common complication following total hip arthroplasty (THA). It presents a significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenge for orthopedic surgeons, as it requires differentiation from infection and often necessitates complex revision surgery. We present the case of a 76-year-old female with a surgical history of total right hip arthroplasty performed one year prior.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The indication for femoral stem cementation should be made on a patient-specific basis, taking physical activity, femoral geometry, and bone tissue quality into account. Age alone should not be the sole justification for cementation. The Dorr classification can serve as decision support for whether a cemented fixation should be used.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • - The study focused on evaluating the effectiveness of a specialized humeral diaphyseal cement restrictor during cemented total shoulder arthroplasty to improve cement pressurization and prevent improper extension.
  • - It included 218 shoulders from 207 patients, with results showing that 81.7% of devices were stable in the medullary canal, and stability was better in primary surgeries (84.2%) compared to revision surgeries (64.3%).
  • - The quality of cement mantle was also assessed, with 69.7% achieving Barrack grade A quality, significantly higher in primary cases (74.2%) compared to revision cases (39.3%).
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!