Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: Fossa piriformis is considered the correct point of entry for a straight femoral nail. A trochanteric overhang may make the access to fossa piriformis difficult. We investigated the anatomy of the trochanteric region, paying special attention to the entry point for antegrade intramedullary femoral nailing.
Methods And Results: We studied 100 cadaver specimens. In 63 specimens a shape with a free entry point was found, whereas in 37 cases the entry point was either half or fully covered. In 9 specimens the entry points could not be exactly located from a cranial aspect.
Interpretation: The anatomic variations of the trochanteric sometimes make it difficult to identify the correct entry point for an intramedullary nail.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17453670610013196 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!