Purpose: To compare three types of digital images for assessment of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) defects: red-free RNFL images, color nonmydriatic images, and digitally converted nonmydriatic red-free fundus images.

Design: Diagnostic test comparison.

Methods: Ninety-five image sets of three type images were evaluated. Converted images were acquired from nonmydriatic digital images by converting them into red-free, monochromatic images with graphics software. Taking RNFL images as standards, the sensitivities/specificities of nonmydriatic digital color and converted images were evaluated for detecting wedge-shaped defect (WSD) or diffuse atrophy.

Results: In terms of WSD, the sensitivity/specificity of converted images were 85.7%/95.5%, and those of nonmydriatic were 83.9%/91.0%. Regarding diffuse atrophy, the sensitivity/specificity of converted images were 60.0%/97.8%, and those of nonmydriatic were 60.0%/98.9%. Intragrader/intergrader agreements for converted images were 0.849/0.793 (WSD) and 0.417/0.614 (diffuse atrophy).

Conclusions: Converted nonmydriatic fundus images without pupillary dilation are as effective as conventional red-free RNFL images for detecting WSD.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2006.09.039DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

converted images
20
images
15
nonmydriatic digital
12
rnfl images
12
red-free monochromatic
8
nonmydriatic
8
fundus images
8
digital images
8
red-free rnfl
8
converted nonmydriatic
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!