Study Objective: To determine the relative effectiveness of two bisphosphonates--pamidronate and zoledronic acid--for preventing skeletal-related events (SREs) in patients with prostate cancer metastatic to bone.
Design: Retrospective cohort study.
Setting: Large, tertiary care cancer center.
Patients: One hundred thirty-seven patients with a diagnosis of prostate cancer who received either pamidronate or zoledronic acid between January 1, 1998, and December 31, 2004, were identified in the electronic medical records; 24 of these patients met all prespecified eligibility criteria, and 105 patients met relaxed eligibility criteria.
Measurements And Main Results: Using a binary logistic regression model, we explored the effect of the bisphosphonate received on development of an SRE. Whether the patient was receiving chemotherapy as of the date of first receipt of a study drug, the number of bisphosphonate doses received, time since the diagnosis of prostate cancer, and the number of previous SREs were included as covariates. The odds ratio for developing an SRE after receiving zoledronic acid was 0.80 (95% confidence interval 0.08-7.50) compared with the reference group that received pamidronate. This difference did not reach statistical significance (p=0.84). Because of the limited number of patients who met all prespecified eligibility criteria, various post hoc analyses were performed in the 105 patients with use of relaxed eligibility criteria. None provided definitive evidence of the superiority of one agent versus the other.
Conclusion: No definitive evidence of a difference in the efficacy for preventing the development of an SRE was found between pamidronate and zoledronic acid, although a smaller-than-expected sample size impairs the interpretability of this finding. In the absence of additional research, it seems reasonable to assume that no clinically important difference exists between the two agents.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1592/phco.27.2.207 | DOI Listing |
Ann Intern Med
January 2025
Durham VA Health Care System, Durham; and Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina (K.M.G.).
Background: Tissue-based genomic classifiers (GCs) have been developed to improve prostate cancer (PCa) risk assessment and treatment recommendations.
Purpose: To summarize the impact of the Decipher, Oncotype DX Genomic Prostate Score (GPS), and Prolaris GCs on risk stratification and patient-clinician decisions on treatment choice among patients with localized PCa considering first-line treatment.
Data Sources: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science published from January 2010 to August 2024.
Ann Intern Med
January 2025
Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona.
Oncologist
January 2025
Department of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada.
Background: Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) has a poor prognosis, necessitating the investigation of novel treatments and targets. This study evaluated JNJ-70218902 (JNJ-902), a T-cell redirector targeting transmembrane protein with epidermal growth factor-like and 2 follistatin-like domains 2 (TMEFF2) and cluster of differentiation 3, in mCRPC.
Patients And Methods: Patients who had measurable/evaluable mCRPC after at least one novel androgen receptor-targeted therapy or chemotherapy were eligible.
Mol Biotechnol
January 2025
Department of Urology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China.
Opioids are the primary regimens for perioperative analgesia with controversial effects on oncological survival. The underlying mechanism remains unexplored. This study developed survival-related gene co-expression networks based on RNA-seq and clinical characteristics from TCGA cohort.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!