A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Revision stapes surgery. | LitMetric

Revision stapes surgery.

Adv Otorhinolaryngol

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital of Essen, Essen, Germany.

Published: April 2007

We present the results of our revision stapes operations from 1989 to 2004 (n = 217). Long-term follow-up was performed in the first 135 cases. Eighteen of these patients were revised because of inner ear symptoms, predominantly within the first year. One hundred and sixteen cases underwent revision surgery due to conductive hearing loss, on average after 10.6 years. One patient was operated because of dysgeusia. In 1999, we first described inner ear damage after implantation of gold prostheses. Therefore, we developed a titanium implant that was initially investigated in cell culture and subsequently tested in a clinical trial. We report on the most frequent causes that led to revision surgery such as adhesions, prosthetic problems, erosions of the long process of the incus, or refixation of the footplate, and on the different surgical techniques. In a first series of patients with a conductive hearing loss, a significant hearing improvement of 69.4% of these cases was obtained. However, this result very much depends on the selection of cases. There was no case of additional sensorineural hearing loss. Since 1999, we had mainly used titanium implants for replacement in stapes revision surgery. In a second series, a significant hearing improvement of 76.2% was found. One patient with a platinum Teflon implant had to be revised because of vertigo and conductive hearing loss which was observed during MRI.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000098851DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

hearing loss
16
revision surgery
12
conductive hearing
12
revision stapes
8
inner ear
8
hearing improvement
8
hearing
6
revision
5
surgery
4
stapes surgery
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!