A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Modified method of AgNOR staining for tissue and interpretation in histopathology. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study conducted at King Edward Medical University from June to December 2002 focused on enhancing the reliability of AgNOR staining to assess cell proliferation in brain lesions.
  • A total of 60 brain specimens were analyzed using a modified AgNOR technique, which proved to be a simple and reproducible alternative to traditional methods, effectively differentiating between malignant and benign conditions.
  • Findings indicated that higher mAgNOR counts and clearer AgNOR dots were associated with higher grades of malignancy, suggesting that both the size and dispersion of AgNORs should be emphasized in future evaluations rather than just the count.

Article Abstract

This study was conducted in the department of Pathology King Edward Medical University, from June to December 2002 to introduce the new method of AgNOR staining and its interpretation to increase its reliability. A total of 60 brain specimens were stained with modified AgNOR technique. The diagnosis of malignancy was made on H & E staining. AgNOR counts, variation in size and dispersion of AgNOR dots in cells were graded and compared in malignant and non-malignant lesions. Modified method of AgNOR staining and interpretation was an easy, reliable and reproducible alternative to traditional AgNOR techniques for evaluating proliferation activity of cells in malignant and benign brain lesions. mAgNOR counts of different grades of astrocytoma (2.97+/-0.96, 3.97+/-0.43, 6.01+/-2.74 and 8.01+/-3.56) were significantly (P<0.01) greater when compared with counts of normal brain (0.40+/-0.01), and reactive gliosis (0.60+/-0.01). AgNOR size and dispersion were of higher grade in a significantly greater proportion of malignancy when compared with benign conditions (P<0.05). The AgNOR dots were brighter and more clear with modified staining when compared with previous studies. We conclude that modified AgNOR staining technique is simple, quick and reliable to evaluate cell proliferation by detecting AgNORs size and dispersion. In future, AgNOR size and dispersion should be considered rather than the count only. We recommend the use of morphometry for AgNOR size in future. We also recommend the use of modified AgNOR staining for obtaining sound and confidant results in routine paraffin sections.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2517289PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2613.2006.00522.xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

method agnor
12
agnor staining
12
modified method
8
staining interpretation
8
agnor
7
staining
4
staining tissue
4
tissue interpretation
4
interpretation histopathology
4
histopathology study
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!