Objectives: To evaluate whether three-dimensional 26-core (3D26) prostate biopsy improves the accuracy in predicting the presence of Gleason pattern 4/5 cancer compared with extended transrectal 12-core (TR12) or transperineal 14-core (TP14) biopsy schemes.
Methods: We studied 143 consecutive men in whom prostate cancer was diagnosed by the 3D26 biopsy and who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) without neoadjuvant treatment. All histologic grading was reevaluated by a single pathologist according to the 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading. Cancer grade was categorized into high grade (Gleason pattern 4/5 cancer present) and non-high grade (absent) in both biopsy and RP specimens. Since TR12 and TP14 biopsy schemes represent subsets of the 3D26 biopsy, we could compare these schemes directly in an identical patient cohort.
Results: There was a grade agreement between 3D26 biopsy and RP in 132 (92.3%) cancers. Grade concordance between biopsy and RP was significantly better in 3D26 biopsy than in TR12 (83.5%, p=0.025) biopsy. Risk of underestimation of cancer grade by 3D26 biopsy (26.5%) was significantly lower than that by TP14 (51.4%, p=0.034). Grade concordance between 3D26 biopsy and RP was not according to clinical variables including prostate volume, clinical stage, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and PSA density.
Conclusions: We demonstrated that the 3D26 biopsy can accurately predict the presence of Gleason pattern 4/5 cancer on RP specimens with a high concordance rate of 92.3%, a value significantly higher than that between extended TR12 biopsy and RP specimens.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2007.01.025 | DOI Listing |
Int J Urol
December 2008
Department of Urology, Graduate School, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Objectives: Most of the previously reported patient selection criteria for nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy were based on conventional sextant biopsy, and those based on extended biopsy have been scarcely investigated. In the current study, we developed patient selection criteria for nerve-sparing RP based on the three-dimensional 26-core (3D26) biopsy-derived variables.
Methods: We evaluated 202 non-nerve-spared sides in 109 consecutive patients in whom prostate cancer was diagnosed by the 3D26 biopsy and who underwent RP without neoadjuvant treatment.
Eur Urol
December 2007
Department of Urology, Graduate School, Tokyo Medical and Dental University Tokyo, Japan.
Objectives: To evaluate whether three-dimensional 26-core (3D26) prostate biopsy improves the accuracy in predicting the presence of Gleason pattern 4/5 cancer compared with extended transrectal 12-core (TR12) or transperineal 14-core (TP14) biopsy schemes.
Methods: We studied 143 consecutive men in whom prostate cancer was diagnosed by the 3D26 biopsy and who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) without neoadjuvant treatment. All histologic grading was reevaluated by a single pathologist according to the 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading.
Int J Clin Oncol
April 2006
Department of Urology, Graduate School, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45 Yushima, Tokyo 113-8519, Japan.
Background: Although an increasing number of men present with stage T1c prostate cancer, the optimal biopsy strategy for detecting stage T1c disease still remains to be defined. The aim of this study was to explore an efficient first-time biopsy scheme for detecting stage T1c and T2 prostate cancer.
Methods: A transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic three-dimensional 26-core (3D26) biopsy comprising 12 transrectal and 14 transperineal sampling sites was performed in 321 men with median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of 6.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!