A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Interocclusal appliances--indications and clinical routines in general dental practice in Sweden. | LitMetric

The aim of this study was to analyse what kind of interocclusal appliances that are used in general dental practice in Sweden, the indications for such treatment, to what extent a clinical status is recorded before treatment, as well as the routines for evaluation of treatment results. The study was a retrospective analysis of patient records from 320 adult patients who had been treated by general dental practitioners in the Public Dental Service in Sweden. For comparison a group of 88 consecutive patients who had received interocclusal appliance therapy at a specialist clinic was used. The most common indication for treatment with hard acrylic stabilisation appliances, as well as with soft appliances, was occlusal wear due to tooth grinding. The second most common indication for treatment with hard acrylic stabilisation appliances was pain from masticatory muscles, while the second most common indication for soft appliances was tension-type headache. Treatment with soft appliances was more often combined with other treatment modalities compared to treatment with hard acrylic stabilisation appliances. Large variations were found between the 3 general dental clinics and the specialist clinic in respect of treatment indications, combinations with other treatment modalities, recording of clinical findings, follow-ups and evaluation of treatment results. General conclusion should, however, be made with caution due to the risk of selection bias. From the results of this study it is obvious that treatment with soft appliances is common in general dental practice in Sweden, despite the lack of scientific support for their efficacy, as well as effectiveness, compared to hard acrylic stabilisation appliances. There is an obvious need for investigations of the decision-making processes among dentists when performing treatment with interocclusal appliances, as well as for randomised controlled studies concerning efficacy and effectiveness of soft appliances.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

general dental
20
soft appliances
20
hard acrylic
16
acrylic stabilisation
16
stabilisation appliances
16
treatment
13
dental practice
12
practice sweden
12
common indication
12
treatment hard
12

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!