Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario.
Published: January 2007
Study Design: In vitro biomechanical flexibility experiment studying 5 sequential conditions.
Objective: To determine the biomechanical differences among 3 fixation techniques after a simulated hangman's fracture.
Summary Of Background Data: Type II hangman's fractures are often treated surgically with a C2-C3 anterior cervical discectomy, fusion, and plating. Other techniques include direct fixation with C2 pars interarticularis screws or posterior C2-C3 fixation connecting C2 pars screws to C3 lateral mass screws.
Methods: Seven cadaveric specimens (Oc-C4) were tested intact, after a simulated hangman's fracture, and after each fixation technique. Flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation were induced using nonconstraining torques while recording angular motions stereophotogrammetrically.
Results: Direct screw fixation reduced motion an average of 61% +/- 13% during lateral bending and axial rotation compared to the injured state (P < 0.007). However, instability remained during flexion and extension. Posterior C2-C3 rod fixation provided significantly greater rigidity than anterior plate fixation during lateral bending (P < 0.008) and axial rotation (P < 0.04).
Conclusions: Direct fixation of the pars ineffectively limits flexion and extension after a Type II hangman's fracture. If pars screw fixation can be achieved, posterior C2-C3 fixation more effectively stabilizes a hangman's fracture than anterior cervical plating.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000251917.83529.0b | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!
© LitMetric 2025. All rights reserved.