A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Fully vs. partially rough implants in maxillary sinus floor augmentation: a randomized-controlled clinical trial. | LitMetric

Fully vs. partially rough implants in maxillary sinus floor augmentation: a randomized-controlled clinical trial.

Clin Oral Implants Res

Department of Periodontology and Oral Gerontology, Royal Dental College, University of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark.

Published: February 2007

Objectives: To compare implants with a rough surface in their whole length (FR) with implants having a 2 mm coronal machined portion (PR) when used in association with a sinus-lift procedure.

Material And Methods: Twenty-six patients with 2 mm< or =x< or =9 mm residual alveolar crest were prosthetically restored with implants after a staged sinus-lift procedure using osteotomes. In 13 randomly chosen patients, no more than one FR implant was placed (test group), while the rest were PR implants. The other 13 patients received only PR implants (control group). For comparisons, only one implant from each patient was used, i.e., from the test group only the 13 FR implants were used, while from the control group, one PR implant was randomly chosen. The presence/absence of plaque, BOP, PPD and REC were registered at the day of delivery of the restorations and after 1 year. Residual alveolar crest height and marginal bone levels around the implants were evaluated on standardized periapical radiographs taken at various stages.

Results: Four FR and two PR implants were lost, and the cumulative survival rate was 82.9% (six lost out of 35). There were no significant differences between the two groups. Implant type, residual alveolar crest height, time of osseointegration, time of implant loading and smoking did not seem to influence implant survival.

Conclusions: FR and PR implants placed in augmented sinuses did not differ in their clinical performance.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01289.xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

residual alveolar
12
alveolar crest
12
implants
10
randomly chosen
8
test group
8
implants control
8
control group
8
crest height
8
implant
6
fully partially
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!