Pacing threshold spikes months and years after implant.

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol

Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Alabama, Birmingham 35294-0007.

Published: November 1991

To determine patterns of variation in chronic pacing thresholds, we made 4,942 threshold measurements in 257 patients with 312 leads, at times from implant to 295 months (median 17 months) including 1,053 determinations in 46 children less than 12 years old. Motivation was late sudden death in two single-ventricle pacemaker-dependent children with multiple possible death causes. At stimulus duration 0.5 +/- 0.04 msec, mean of the thresholds, measured 1 month or more after implant, was 1.3 +/- 0.66 volts (V) for endocardial electrodes and 2.8 +/- 1.39 V for epicardially applied electrodes. Highest mean thresholds were in the 6 to 12-year-old age group. In 34 leads studied at implant, again within a month and for at least three years thereafter, time of maximum threshold occurred after one month in 59%, independent of lead type or patient age. Of 107 leads with five or more measurements after 3 months use, gradual increase in threshold continued after 3 months in 24%. An additional 21% had at least one threshold that exceeded the post-three-months individual patient lead mean by three standard deviations. Most striking was the occurrence of transient several-volt increases and decreases in threshold as late as 8 years after lead implantation in at least three children. These temporary changes were detected initially transtelephonically by the vario method of threshold measurement. They occurred during minor illnesses such as summer colds, yet similar illnesses also occurred without threshold elevation. We suggest further study of pacing threshold variations in highly pacemaker-dependent children whose cardiac anatomy makes use of epicardial electrodes necessary.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.1991.tb02775.xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pacing threshold
8
threshold
8
pacemaker-dependent children
8
months
5
threshold spikes
4
spikes months
4
years
4
months years
4
implant
4
years implant
4

Similar Publications

A long-term clinical comparative study of left bundle branch pacing versus biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure and complete left bundle branch block.

Heart Vessels

January 2025

Department of Cardiology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fujian Institute of Coronary Heart Disease, Fujian Heart Medical Center, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, China.

Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) is an emerging physiological pacing technique characterized by stable pacing parameters and a narrower QRS duration. This study aims to compare the long-term efficacy and safety of biventricular pacing (BIVP) and LBBP in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and complete left bundle branch block (CLBBB). A retrospective analysis was conducted on 35 patients with chronic HFrEF accompanied by CLBBB treated at our center from April 2018 to October 2022.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: The advancement of medical technology has introduced leadless pacemakers (LPMs) as a significant innovation in cardiac pacing, offering potential advantages over traditional ventricular transvenous pacemakers. This report explores the application of LPMs in two patients with complex valvular histories, particularly those with mechanical tricuspid valves.

Case Reports: The first case involves a 60-year-old male with a history of rheumatic heart disease and triple valve replacement who developed a high-grade AV block.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Interventricular dyssynchrony derived from the classic non-physiological stimulation (n-PS) of the right ventricle (RV) is a known cause of left ventricular dysfunction (LVDys).

Methods: This was a prospective descriptive single-center study. We analyzed patients who develop LVDys with n-PS, and the results after upgrading to conduction system pacing (CSP).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Noninferiority of omitting intraoperative defibrillation threshold (DFT) testing has been documented for transvenous implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) whereas data for the subcutaneous-ICD (S-ICD) regarding the need for DFT testing, especially during S-ICD generator replacement, is not available.

Methods: A total of 112 consecutive patients who underwent S-ICD generator replacement and routine testing were included in this retrospective single-center study and analyzed regarding the outcome of intraoperative DFT.

Results: The majority of patients (87.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Unlabelled: New cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs), such as leadless pacemakers and subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillators (S-ICDs), are being used in patients with adult congenital heart disease. The selection of CIEDs often requires careful consideration due to technical challenges posed by a unique heart structure. A 27-year-old man following a surgical tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) repair developed non-sustained ventricular tachycardia, sick sinus syndrome, and complete atrioventricular block.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!