To establish an optimal categorization of cancer deposits without lymph node structure (extranodal cancer deposits [EX]) in a prognostic staging system, we analyzed 1,027 cases in which patients underwent potentially curative surgery for advanced colorectal adenocarcinoma. EX was classified as vascular invasion-type (VAS) or non-VAS.A total of 512 foci of EX were identified in 205 patients (20.0%), with VAS and non-VAS found in 68 and 182 patients, respectively. The hazard ratio for patients with nodal involvement was 3.6 and for patients with VAS and non-VAS, 2.5 and 4.7, respectively. Based on multivariate analysis of these 3 parameters, only nodal involvement and non-VAS were significant prognosticators. By using the Akaike information criterion, N staging was capable of predicting survival outcome with the highest accuracy when both nodal involvement and non-VAS were treated together as an N factor and VAS was treated as a T factor ("new categorization"). The clinical significance of the TNM grading system for colorectal cancer would be enhanced if we treat EX as a new categorization.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1309/903UT10VQ3LC7B8LDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cancer deposits
12
nodal involvement
12
colorectal cancer
8
optimal categorization
8
prognostic staging
8
vas non-vas
8
involvement non-vas
8
treated factor
8
patients
5
extramural cancer
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!