Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Purpose: To present a novel in-vitro pig model for testing the design and function of different internal catheter constructs, along with the resulting exit wound resulting from removal.
Materials And Methods: We compared the pullout parameters of two nephrostomy catheters that differ only in their internal loop design.
Results: Greater force, work, and displacement are necessary to extricate catheters with a double loop without increasing exit-wound size.
Conclusion: Although the differences were not statistically significant, results from this model have potential clinical implications that may prompt further design modifications and prototype development to improve the retention of catheters in the kidney, thus reducing patient discomfort and costs associated with repeated catheter placement.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/end.2006.20.1041 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!