Spinal canal decompression via cervical laminectomy with or without foraminotomy is a mainstay of treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy and myeloradiculopathy. The goal of this surgery is to expand the cervical canal dorsally by removing the spinous processes, laminae, ligamentum flavum, and bony hypertrophy that are contributing to the canal stenosis. In selecting this particular approach to decompression, the surgeon must take into account the spinal geometry and the primary pathology of the patient: an "effective" cervical kyphosis is a contraindication to a dorsal approach, and spinal canal compromise secondary to ventral compression is best addressed through a ventral or a combined ventral and dorsal approach. This technique is technically facile and versatile in application. Complications with this procedure are relatively rare, with postoperative spinal instability being the primary concern. With proper patient selection and attention to surgical technique, laminectomy is a safe and effective approach to the management of cervical myelopathy in selected patients.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000249219.72956.C7 | DOI Listing |
J Clin Med
January 2025
Department of Neurosurgery, University of Luebeck, 23562 Luebeck, Germany.
: This study aims to retrospectively detect associations with postoperative complications in spinal surgeries during the hospitalization period using standardized, single-center data to validate a method for complication detection and discuss the potential future use of generated data. : Data were generated in 2006-2019 from a standardized, weekly complications conference reviewing all neurosurgical operations at the University Hospital Luebeck. Paper-based data were recorded in a standardized manner during the conference and transferred with a time delay of one week into a proprietary complication register.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJBJS Essent Surg Tech
January 2025
Department of Neurosurgery, Center for Neuroscience and Spine, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington.
Background: Prone transpsoas lumbar interbody fusion (PTP) is a newer technique to treat various spinal disc pathologies. PTP is a variation of lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) that is performed with the patient prone rather than in the lateral decubitus position. This approach offers similar benefits of lateral spinal surgery, which include less blood loss, shorter hospital stay, and quicker recovery compared with traditional open spine surgery.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAsian Spine J
January 2025
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Selecting the optimal surgical treatment for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy and radiculopathy significantly affects symptom improvement, postoperative prognosis, and quality of life. Proper patient selection and precise surgical execution are crucial for achieving successful outcomes, considering the favorable natural course of cervical radiculopathy. Several factors must be considered, including the number of affected segments, spinal alignment, kyphosis degree, stiffness, and surgeon expertise, when determining the surgical approach for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFN Am Spine Soc J
March 2025
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.
Background: Laminectomy and fusion (LF) and laminoplasty (LP) are common treatments for cervical spondylotic myelopathy and myeloradiculopathy. While both procedures show similar clinical improvement, LF requires bony fusion while LP offers motion preservation. Cervical sagittal alignment and horizontal gaze maintenance are key outcome measures, but their comparative effects between LF and LP remain unclear.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFClin Neurol Neurosurg
January 2025
Department of Neurosurgery, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra, Long Island Jewish Medical Center and North Shore University Hospital, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, United States.
Background: This study aimed to examine associations between age and outcomes in acute cervical SCI (cSCI) patients.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Programs database to compare outcomes for acute cSCI patients stratified by age: 18-44, 45-65, and > 65 years. Patient demographics, comorbidities, injury type, treatment modality, AEs, and length of stay (LOS) were assessed.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!