A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Assessment of oral trigeminal sensitivity in humans. | LitMetric

Assessment of oral trigeminal sensitivity in humans.

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.

Published: May 2007

The aim of this prospective study was to establish a clinical test for the assessment of oral trigeminal sensitivity. Capsaicin-impregnated filter paper strips (five concentrations: 0.0001-1%) were used to measure trigeminal thresholds. The strips were placed on the anterior tongue for 10 s. Subjects were asked to report the onset of any sensory perception, quality and duration of sensory perception. Thresholds were estimated in two ways: (1) threshold (THR1) related to sensory perception and (2) intensity related threshold (THR2). The test was applied to 63 healthy subjects (mean age 40 years; 34 women, 29 men). For whole-mouth testing with capsaicin, a small but significant correlation was found between THR1 and THR2 (r (63) = 0.41). Coefficients of correlation between test and re-test were r (30) = 0.60 for THR1 and r (30) = 0.78 THR2. Neither THR1 nor THR2 indicated either side or sex-related differences. Age-related differences were only found in THR2 scores, which were lower in young subjects (<40 years). Reliable assessment of intraoral trigeminal sensitivity appears to be possible using the presently described technique.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-006-0218-4DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

sensory perception
12
assessment oral
8
oral trigeminal
8
trigeminal sensitivity
8
thr1 thr2
8
thr2
5
sensitivity humans
4
humans aim
4
aim prospective
4
prospective study
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!