Background: The color, architecture, symmetry, and homogeneity (CASH) algorithm for dermoscopy includes a feature not used in prior algorithms, namely, architecture. Architectural order/disorder is derived from current concepts regarding the biology of benign versus malignant melanocytic neoplasms.

Objective: We sought to evaluate the accuracy of the CASH algorithm.

Methods: A total CASH score (TCS) was calculated for dermoscopic images of 325 melanocytic neoplasms. Sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy, and receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were performed by comparing the TCS with the histopathologic diagnoses for all lesions.

Results: The mean TCS was 12.28 for melanoma, 7.62 for dysplastic nevi, and 5.24 for nondysplastic nevi. These differences were statistically significant (P < .001). A TCS of 8 or more yielded a sensitivity of 98% and specificity of 68% for the diagnosis of melanoma.

Limitations: This is a single-evaluator pilot study. Additional studies are needed to verify the CASH algorithm.

Conclusions: The CASH algorithm can distinguish melanoma from melanocytic nevi with sensitivity and specificity comparable with other algorithms. Further study is warranted to determine its intraobserver and interobserver correlations.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2006.09.003DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

color architecture
8
architecture symmetry
8
symmetry homogeneity
8
algorithm dermoscopy
8
cash algorithm
8
sensitivity specificity
8
cash
6
cash color
4
homogeneity algorithm
4
dermoscopy background
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!