A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Computer-enhanced robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology. | LitMetric

Computer-enhanced robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology.

Surg Endosc

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, William Beaumont Hospital, 3601 W. Thirteen Mile Road #302, Royal Oak, MI 48073-6769, USA.

Published: February 2007

Background: This study aimed to report the computer-enhanced robotic surgery experience of the authors' gynecologic oncology division.

Methods: From January 2001 to August 2006, 41 patients underwent laparoscopic surgery by our gynecologic oncology service using a computer-enhanced surgical robot. This report describes a retrospective review of these patients.

Results: The patients ranged in age from 27 to 77 years (mean, 44.2 years), in weight from 44 to 131 kg (mean, 72.1 kg), in operative time from 1 h and 50 min to 9 h (mean, 5 h and 2 min), and in estimated blood loss from 50 to 1,500 ml (mean, 253 ml). Of the 20 patients with gynecologic malignancies, 14 had cervical cancer. A total of 21 patients had benign indications for surgery. Complications included shoulder palsy, robot failure, colotomy, bradycardia, and intraabdominal bleeding requiring minilaparotomy and ligation of a bleeding pedicle.

Conclusion: This case series is one of the first to report the use of a computer-enhanced surgical robot in gynecologic oncology. This approach proved to be feasible and well tolerated in this series of patients and deserves further study for clarification of its indications, benefits, and safety.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-006-0894-6DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

gynecologic oncology
16
computer-enhanced robotic
8
robotic surgery
8
surgery gynecologic
8
report computer-enhanced
8
computer-enhanced surgical
8
surgical robot
8
gynecologic
5
patients
5
computer-enhanced
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!