Coronary artery disease (CAD) is still an important cause of morbidity and mortality in the Western world. The gold standard for assessing significant coronary artery stenosis is invasive coronary angiography. Several disadvantages of the technique in combination with the fact that a substantial number of patients referred for conventional angiography appear free from significant stenosis have led to the pursuit of non-invasive imaging modalities for the diagnosis of CAD. The traditional modalities for this purpose are gated single-photon emission computed tomography, position emission tomography, (contrast) stress echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), and these techniques can be characterized as functional imaging techniques as they detect ischaemia. Although the presence of a flow-limiting stenosis can be adequately ruled out with these techniques, atherosclerosis cannot be visualized with functional techniques. For this purpose, non-invasive coronary angiography techniques (computed tomography and CMR) are currently under development. The purpose of this review is to provide the reader an overview of the currently used imaging modalities to detect CAD.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldl014 | DOI Listing |
J Cardiothorac Surg
January 2025
Department of Cardiology, The first Affiliated Hospital of Wannan, Medical College, Wuhu, China.
Background: He's team have recently developed a new Coronary Artery Tree description and Lesion EvaluaTion (CatLet) angiographic scoring system, which is capable of accounting for the variability in coronary anatomy, and risk-stratifying patients with coronary artery disease. Preliminary studies have demonstrated its superiority over the the Synergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) score with respect to outcome predictions for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients. However, there are fewer studies on the prognostic in chronic coronary artery disease(CAD).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJACC Cardiovasc Interv
January 2025
Center for Coronary Artery Disease, Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA; Minneapolis Heart Institute, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA. Electronic address:
JACC Cardiovasc Interv
January 2025
Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy; Cardio Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv
January 2025
Ascension St Vincent Heart Center of Indiana, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Background: The optimal timing for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is debatable.
Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare outcomes based on the timing of PCI in stable coronary artery disease patients undergoing TAVR.
Methods: Leveraging the STS/ACC TVT Registry and Medicare Linkage, we analyzed patients with stable coronary artery disease undergoing PCI and TAVR between 2015 and 2023 using the SAPIEN 3 balloon-expandable valve platform.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv
January 2025
Institut Cardiovasculaire Paris-Sud, Hôpital Privé Jacques Cartier, Ramsay-Santé, Massy, France. Electronic address:
Background: The prevalence of coronary artery disease in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is high. Treatment of a coronary events (CE) after TAVR can be technically challenging.
Objectives: The authors sought to assess the incidence and prognostic impact of CE after TAVR.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!